• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Whistleblowing – what does ‘public interest’ mean?

30th April 2015/in News /by Nicola Brown

The recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) case of Chesterton Global Ltd (t/a Chestertons) and another v Nurmohamed (2015) concerned a Director (Mr Nurmohamed) of the Mayfair office of a firm of estate agents. Mr Nurmohamed made protected disclosures i.e. he ‘blew the whistle’ about manipulations of the company accounts. Mr Nurmohamed believed that financial information was being deliberately misstated so as to reduce the commission payments that he and around 100 senior managers would have otherwise received. Mr Nurmohamed was dismissed and brought claims against his employer in the Employment Tribunal (ET).

Workers who blow the whistle are given the benefit of legal protection. Providing that certain requirements are met, a worker has the right not to be unfairly dismissed or to be subjected to a detriment because they have made a protected disclosure.

Since 25 June 2013, the requirement that a disclosure had to be made in “good faith” no longer applies, although Employment Tribunals have been given the power to reduce any compensation awarded to a claimant by up to 25% if the protected disclosure was not made in good faith.

The changes in June 2013 also involved inserting a “public interest” test into the legislation on qualifying disclosures. This means that, for disclosures made on or after 25 June 2013, the worker must have a reasonable belief that the disclosure they are making is in the public interest.

The public interest requirement was introduced to reverse the effect of the case of Parkins v Sodexho (2001) in which the EAT held that whistleblowing protection can cover someone who blows the whistle about a breach of their own contract of employment, even where the disclosure only concerns them personally and is not in the public interest.

Getting back to the Chesterton case, the ET found that Mr Nurmohamed had made qualifying disclosures and that it was his reasonable belief that the disclosures would be in the interests of the 100 senior managers. The ET held that the 100 senior managers amounted to a sufficient section of ‘the public’ for the disclosure to be in the public interest; it was not necessary for the disclosure to be of interest to the entirety of the public.

Mr Nurmohamed’s employer appealed to the EAT on the grounds that the 100 senior managers were not a sufficient group of ‘the public’ for the disclosures to be in the public interest and that the question of whether the disclosures were in the public interest should be determined by the Tribunal objectively.

The EAT confirmed that a sufficient section of the public would be affected (the 100 senior managers) so as to satisfy the public interest test and held that it didn’t matter whether a disclosure was actually in the public interest, but only whether the worker believed that it was in the public interest and his belief was, objectively, reasonable.

Whilst the EAT ruled that in order to pass the public interest test it is sufficient for a section of the public to be affected, it is not possible to say how many people would need to be affected as this will depend on the facts in each case.

Although the introduction of the public interest test may have put an additional hurdle in the path of workers trying to establish whistleblowing protection, it would appear that the hurdle is relatively low and certainly lower than many people expected when the change in the law was introduced.

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2015-04-30 15:53:592015-04-30 17:04:59Whistleblowing – what does ‘public interest’ mean?

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • What to expect during 2021 – employment law developments 21st January 2021
  • Did “office banter” about an employee’s memory amount to age discrimination? 21st January 2021
  • Update on Furlough 20th January 2021
  • Restricting Restrictive Covenants? 20th January 2021
  • Q&A: What to expect from a remote Tribunal hearing 20th January 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only