• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Whistleblowing – public interest test comes (nearly) full circle?

29th October 2015/in News /by Nicola Brown

Under whistleblowing legislation, workers who make a protected disclosure (also known as “blowing the whistle”) are protected from being subjected to a detriment by their employer on the grounds that they have blown the whistle and, if the worker is dismissed, then the dismissal will be automatically unfair if the reason (or principal reason) for it is that they have made a protected disclosure. For more information about what can constitute whistleblowing see Nicola’s article here.

As we have previously reported, changes to whistleblowing legislation in June 2013 introduced a new “public interest” test which meant that the worker making the disclosure must have a reasonable belief that it is in the public interest. The public interest requirement was introduced to close a loophole from the case of Parkins v Sodexho (2001) in which the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) had held that whistleblowing protection covered someone who blows the whistle about a breach of their own contract of employment, even where the disclosure only concerns them personally and does not have any interest to the wider public.

Back in April, we reported on the EAT case of Chesterton Global Ltd (t/a Chestertons) and another v Nurmohamed (2015) in which it was confirmed that a relatively small group of 100 senior managers was a sufficient section of the public to satisfy the public interest test.

Now the position has developed yet further. Following a recent decision by the EAT in the case of Underwood v Wincanton plc (2015), workers may again be afforded protection under the whistleblowing provisions when making disclosures about breaches of their own employment contracts. In the Underwood case, a group of four lorry drivers had raised a complaint with their employer about the terms and conditions of their employment, in particular in relation to the allocation of overtime. One of the employees (Mr Underwood) was dismissed and he brought a claim on the grounds that his dismissal was automatically unfair because he had been dismissed for “blowing the whistle”.

The Employment Tribunal (ET), which heard the case three months before the EAT’s decision in Chesterton, struck out the claim on the basis that the dispute was not in the public interest.

The EAT, however, allowed Mr Underwood’s appeal and sent the case back to the ET to be heard. The EAT held that, following Chesterton, it was possible for a matter to be “in the public interest” even though it involved a dispute between a group of employees and their employer about terms and conditions of employment. It had been argued that this could not be the case – how could the interests of such a small group of workers amount to a ‘public interest’? However, although the EAT did not reach a conclusion as to whether the public interest test was met in Mr Underwood’s case, they did conclude that it was potentially possible for the test to be met where issues are raised by ‘a group of employees’ to their employer.

This begs the question of how small the group could be – could two employees raising a joint complaint be a ‘group’ and therefore qualify for the public interest test? And if two could qualify, why not one? If it were possible for an individual complainant to gain protection then we would be back full circle to Parkins v Sodexho!

Although the Chesterton case is being appealed to the Court of Appeal, it is not expected to be heard until October 2016, so until the outcome of that is known employees who raise disputes about the terms and conditions of their contracts may be afforded extra protection under whistleblowing legislation.

Whistleblowing issues are not always easy to identify and can require careful handling – it is always best to take advice if you are dealing with a potential whistleblowing issue, as a quick call to us could save a costly Tribunal claim later. If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2015-10-29 23:17:382015-10-30 00:18:34Whistleblowing – public interest test comes (nearly) full circle?

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • What to expect during 2021 – employment law developments 21st January 2021
  • Did “office banter” about an employee’s memory amount to age discrimination? 21st January 2021
  • Update on Furlough 20th January 2021
  • Restricting Restrictive Covenants? 20th January 2021
  • Q&A: What to expect from a remote Tribunal hearing 20th January 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only