• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Whistleblower protection expanded to cover perceived or potential disclosures?

15 August 2019

Picture of a whistle

The recent case of Bilsbrough v Berry Marketing Services dealt with an interesting point – if an employee or worker hasn’t actually made a whistleblowing disclosure, but is preparing to do so, or if the employer wrongly thinks they have blown the whistle, are they still protected?

Under a strict reading of the relevant legislation, protection only applies “on the ground that the employee has made the protected disclosure”, i.e. the disclosure has to have actually been made.

In the Bilsbrough case, the allegations related to two situations; one was a disclosure that had actually been made, and the other was a situation where the employee had been researching how to make a disclosure (in this case to the Information Commissioner) but had not actually done so. Was he protected in relation to the potential disclosure?

The Employment Tribunal considered its obligation under the Human Rights Act to interpret legislation in a way which is consistent with the right to freedom of expression, even in cases which only involve private employers rather than public bodies. It felt that because the legislation had been put in place to protect whistleblowers, they were able to give a ‘purposive’ interpretation to the wording, i.e. they could interpret it in a way which is consistent with the purpose of the legislation.

As a result, the Tribunal found that the potential disclosure did give the employee protection:

“In a case such as this, if an employee does not know how to make a disclosure to a regulator, he or she will have no option but to research how to do so. If such research is discovered before the disclosure is made and an employee can legitimately be subjected to a detriment or dismissed as a result, then the ability to make a protected disclosure is greatly diminished.

The same would apply in respect of an employee who looked into making a protected disclosure but then decided, for whatever reason not to do so. If a person cannot consider making a disclosure without the risk of sanction, even if that consideration leads to a decision not to make a disclosure, then there will be a chilling effect on the making of protective disclosures…

It seems to us that the ability to find out how to make a public interest disclosure and to consider whether or not to make it, is an integral part of making it.”

It is important to point out that this decision is Employment Tribunal level only, and therefore other Employment Tribunals are not obliged to follow it. The case may well be appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, and it will be interesting to see whether the decision is upheld there. We will of course keep you updated on that in our future ebulletins.

Although some people may feel that this decision goes too far, it is worth bearing in mind the equivalent position under discrimination law regarding victimisation. The Equality Act specifically gives protection against victimisation not only where the employee has done a ‘protected act’ (such as making an allegation of discrimination) but also where the employer believes that the employee ‘has done, or may do, a protected act’.

If the Bilsbrough case does become binding law, then it would widen whistleblowing protection significantly. Often those who ‘blow the whistle’ do so confidentially or anonymously, but within many workplaces there are often rumours or speculation about who the likely whistleblower could be. To try and avoid potential claims in your organisation, it would be worth ensuring that your policies and procedures are up to date and also that managers are trained on how to deal with whistleblowing situations. We can help with both of these – do get in touch if you would like to discuss it further.

If you are dealing with a whistleblowing issue, then we can help. Please call us on 01243 836840 for a no obligation chat, or email us at [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • FAQs about COT3s 18th December 2020
  • Can an employer withdraw a notice of redundancy? 18th December 2020
  • Will employers be able to insist that staff have the Covid-19 vaccination? 18th December 2020
  • Furlough over Christmas? 18th December 2020
  • Update – Furlough scheme extended 18th December 2020
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only