• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

When can discrimination be justified?

1st August 2011/in News /by Nicola Brown

The law protects people against discrimination on the basis of a large number of protected characteristics, for example sex and race, but can discrimination ever be justified?

The short answer is sometimes!  Where there is direct discrimination, for example a refusal to employ someone because they were gay, then that can never be justified, except for when the direct discrimination is on the grounds of age.  However, where the discrimination is indirect, it is capable of justification.

Indirect discrimination occurs where:

 A applies to B a provision, criterion or practice (PCP).

  • B has a particular protected characteristic, for example religion or philosophical belief.
  • A applies (or would apply) that PCP to persons not of the same religion or philosophical belief as B.
  • The PCP puts or would put persons of B’s religion or philosophical belief at a particular disadvantage when compared to other persons.
  • The PCP puts or would put B at that disadvantage.
  • A cannot justify the PCP by showing it to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

There have been a couple of interesting cases recently on what can amount to a proportionate means  of achieving a legitimate aim, that is when indirect discrimination may be justified.

 The first of these is Dhinsa v Serco.  In this case Mr Dhinsa was a Sikh prison officer.  He wanted to wear a kirpan (ceremonial dagger), one of the five articles of faith worn by Amritdhari Sikhs, whilst on duty at the prison.  Perhaps not surprisingly, his employers refused permission on the grounds of safety.  Mr Dhinsa brought a claim of indirect religious discrimination.

The tribunal held that the ban did put Amritdhari Sikhs at a disadvantage because of their religious belief, even if it did not put Sikhs as a whole at a disadvantage as less than ten percent were Amritdhari Sikhs.  The tribunal went on to find that, even if there was indirect discrimination, the ban was justified by the legitimate aim of promoting safety and security within the prison, and the ban was a proportionate means of achieving this aim.

The second case revolves around whether denying a person time off for a religious activity was indirect discrimination.  In the case of Cherfi v G4S Security Services, Mr Cherfi was a Muslim employed as a security guard and worked at a client’s site.  He wanted to leave the client’s site at lunchtime on Fridays to attend Mosque for Friday prayers.  His employer refused to allow this and he brought a claim of religious discrimination.  The tribunal held that balancing the operational needs of the employer against the discriminatory effect on the employee, the requirement for Mr Cherfi to remain on site on Friday afternoon was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.  This decision was upheld on appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

It is worth noting that the Employment Appeal Tribunal indicated that, although in this case the employer’s arguments had not been solely down to cost, had cost been the only argument they would have been inclined to allow that.  There has been conflicting authority as to whether cost alone can ever justify discrimination, but it appears that the courts will now be inclined to allow cost alone as the basis for justification in appropriate cases.

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected])

Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2011-08-01 08:48:572014-12-03 16:00:14When can discrimination be justified?

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • What to expect during 2021 – employment law developments 21st January 2021
  • Did “office banter” about an employee’s memory amount to age discrimination? 21st January 2021
  • Update on Furlough 20th January 2021
  • Restricting Restrictive Covenants? 20th January 2021
  • Q&A: What to expect from a remote Tribunal hearing 20th January 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only