• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

What is the role of an investigator?

23 November 2019

Man talking to man and woman at meeting

It has long been established that the correct way for an employer to deal with allegations of misconduct against an employee is for there to be an investigation into the alleged misconduct, and then, if appropriate, a disciplinary hearing to decide whether the employee is guilty of the alleged misconduct, and if so, what sanction to impose. If a sanction is imposed, then the employee should be given the right of appeal. In order for the process to be fair, then wherever possible and where the employer’s resources allow, different people should carry out the investigation, the disciplinary hearing and the appeal.

One question which comes up frequently is to what extent should the investigation decide whether the employee is guilty or not? This was something which was considered by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in the recent case of Dronsfield v University of Reading.

The facts

In this case, an academic (Dronsfield) had a sexual relationship with an adult student. The University did not prohibit such relationships, but did have a policy that academics in those types of relationship must tell their head of department, as otherwise there might be real or perceived favouritism or disadvantage to the student. In this case a complaint was made to the University by the student’s ex-boyfriend.

An investigation was started into the following allegations: (a) having a sexual relationship with a student without reporting it, creating a potential conflict of interest; (b) abusing a position of power to influence a vulnerable student to enter into a personal relationship; (c) acting in breach of duty of care responsibilities towards students; and (d) holding late-night meetings with female students involving alcohol.

The academic accepted that he had had sex with the student, but claimed that there was no ongoing relationship and hence nothing to report. He also maintained that the initial approaches had been instigated by the student rather than by him. He had not reported the matter because he said he had previously raised complaints about his colleagues, including an allegation of bullying by his line manager, and was unhappy with how the University had responded to these. As a result, he claimed that he had no faith in the University. He accepted that he had been involved with the supervision of the student, and had marked her dissertation, (the grade he awarded was similar to the grade reached by two co-markers). His account was accepted as accurate, and the student was not interviewed.

At issue was the investigation report. As is common with an investigation report, it went through a series of drafts. It was also reviewed by the University’s in-house solicitor. One striking difference between the penultimate and final drafts was that the earlier draft contained a statement by the investigator to say that ‘there is no evidence to suggest that the conduct of Dronsfield constituted conduct of an immoral, scandalous or disgraceful nature’, wording which came from the University’s disciplinary policy. This wording had been removed in the final version.

The investigation found that he had a consensual sexual relationship with an adult student and that he was in breach of the university’s policy by not reporting this. The penultimate report noted that the fact that he had a ‘dysfunctional relationship’ with his line manager did not absolve him of this responsibility. Mr Dronsfield was summarily dismissed for gross misconduct.

The decision

Mr Dronsfield brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal claiming that his dismissal was unfair. Amongst other things, he argued that the removal of the wording in the investigation report showed that the investigation was flawed. The Tribunal did not agree, and although he appealed to the EAT, the appeal also failed. However, what the case illustrates is that as part of the Tribunal disclosure process previous versions of documents are disclosable, and whilst on the facts of this particular case the change in approach did not render the dismissal unfair, in slightly different circumstances it may well do so. The case also illustrates the trap that so many investigations fall into – reaching conclusions, which, as stated above, should not be their role. The investigation should be about whether there is sufficient evidence for the allegations to be dealt with under the disciplinary procedure, not whether the allegations may constitute gross misconduct.

How we can help

Carrying out a disciplinary investigation can be time consuming and difficult. Each case is different, but there may well be witnesses to interview, documents to review, CCTV to view etc. Many employers understandably do not have the resources to manage a complex investigation. We have carried out independent investigations for a number of employers, and then made recommendations to them whether to take matters further and conduct a disciplinary process. If you would like to know more about this service, please visit our Investigations, Hearings and Appeals page, or contact us.

If you need help with an investigation, or would like advice on a situation you are dealing with, please call us on 01243 836840 for a no obligation chat, or email us at [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • FAQs about COT3s 18th December 2020
  • Can an employer withdraw a notice of redundancy? 18th December 2020
  • Will employers be able to insist that staff have the Covid-19 vaccination? 18th December 2020
  • Furlough over Christmas? 18th December 2020
  • Update – Furlough scheme extended 18th December 2020
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only