• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Was an employer liable for an employee’s offensive Facebook posts?

16 July 2019

Scales of Justice image

At our recent employment law update workshops we talked about the case law on vicarious liability, which is where an employer is held liable for the actions of its employees if those actions are ‘in the course of employment’. Many of the recent vicarious liability cases involve liability for personal injury, although the same principles apply to employment claims.

The recent case of Forbes v LHR Airport was an employment claim – in particular, a complaint of race discrimination.

The facts

Mr Forbes worked as a security officer at Heathrow Airport. His colleagues included B and S. S shared an image of a golliwog on her Facebook page, saying “Let’s see how far he can travel before Facebook takes him off.” Mr Forbes was not friends on Facebook with S, so did not see the post initially, but did so subsequently when B showed it to him. Mr Forbes then complained to his line manager, and the complaint became a formal grievance.

As a result, disciplinary action was taken against S. She apologised and was given a final written warning. However, Mr Forbes was unhappy about being expected to work with S, and ultimately ended up bringing a claim for harassment against LHR Airport on the basis that it was vicariously liable for S’s actions. An Employment Tribunal found LHR was not vicariously liable, so Mr Forbes submitted an appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).

What was the EAT’s view?

A key question for the EAT was whether the Facebook post had been ‘in the course of employment‘ when it was posted by S.

They agreed with the Tribunal’s conclusion that most ordinary people would not consider that sharing an image on a private Facebook page was something done in the course of employment. Obviously it had later been shown to Mr Forbes by B, but it was the time when S shared the image that was relevant in this case.

The EAT specifically did not want to set down any rigid rules about when social media posts would give rise to vicarious liability. Essentially, they said that whether something is done in the course of employment online will be a question of fact for the Tribunal in each case, taking account of all the circumstances. They said that there may be circumstances in which sharing an image on Facebook could be found to have been in the course of employment, and this is more likely to apply where (for example) the Facebook page is solely or principally used for work purposes.
Usefully, the EAT also commented that just because an employer considers it appropriate to take action against employees for conduct on social media does not necessarily mean that the conduct in question was in the course of employment. Depending on their policies and procedures employers are able to take action for conduct outside work.

Conclusions

Although this case deliberately did not give any clear rules, it is nevertheless useful to illustrate that there needs to be some connection to employment in order for vicarious liability to apply.
It is also important to note that even if LHR had been found to be vicariously liable, the EAT confirmed that they would have been able to defend the claim. This is because in discrimination claims, an employer has a defence if it can show that it took  all reasonable steps to prevent the discriminatory act (section 109(4) of the Equality Act 2010). For this purpose, ‘reasonable steps’ usually includes things like:

 – Having effective policies on equality and harassment (and social media) and ensuring they are up to date

– Ensuring staff are trained and regularly reminded about the policies

– Ensuring any complaints or allegations are investigated properly and any issues addressed

Here, as LHR had appropriate policies and had properly investigated Mr Forbes’ complaint, the EAT were satisfied that the reasonable steps defence would have applied. It is always worth employers trying to put themselves in the best position they can to rely upon this defence.

Conclusions

Although this case deliberately did not give any clear rules, it is nevertheless useful to illustrate that there needs to be some connection to employment in order for vicarious liability to apply.
It is also important to note that even if LHR had been found to be vicariously liable, the EAT confirmed that they would have been able to defend the claim. This is because in discrimination claims, an employer has a defence if it can show that it took  all reasonable steps to prevent the discriminatory act (section 109(4) of the Equality Act 2010). For this purpose, ‘reasonable steps’ usually includes things like:
    • Having effective policies on equality and harassment (and social media) and ensuring they are up to date
    • Ensuring staff are trained and regularly reminded about the policies
    • Ensuring any complaints or allegations are investigated properly and any issues addressed

Here, as LHR had appropriate policies and had properly investigated Mr Forbes’ complaint, the EAT were satisfied that the reasonable steps defence would have applied. It is always worth employers trying to put themselves in the best position they can to rely upon this defence.

If you are dealing with a discrimination issue, or if you would like help with equality policies or training, then we can help. Please call us on 01243 836840 for a no obligation chat, or email us at [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • FAQs about COT3s 18th December 2020
  • Can an employer withdraw a notice of redundancy? 18th December 2020
  • Will employers be able to insist that staff have the Covid-19 vaccination? 18th December 2020
  • Furlough over Christmas? 18th December 2020
  • Update – Furlough scheme extended 18th December 2020
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only