• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Was a dismissal for causing ‘friction’ when implementing health and safety rules unfair?

03 June 2021

A conversation across a desk

As an increasing number of employees return to their usual workplaces following lockdown, there will be a focus upon establishing health and safety rules to limit the risk of Covid-19 transmission. Some employees may resist additional rules or may challenge the efficacy of measures. Although the case below does not concern Covid-19 safety rules, it involves an employee who was dismissed for the way he implemented new health and safety measures. The outcome is therefore relevant to employers planning to roll-out new health and safety rules.

The case

In the case of Sinclair v Trackwork Ltd, Mr Sinclair began his employment as a Track Maintenance Supervisor in October 2018. Trackwork Limited provides construction and engineering services to railway network providers.

Mr Sinclair was instructed to implement and supervise the carrying out of new safety procedures, but his colleagues were not told about this decision. The Maintenance Manager wanted a slow change, but this was not communicated to Mr Sinclair. Mr Sinclair’s colleagues complained about the way he implemented the new system, commenting on his perceived ‘over-cautious and zealous approach’ to management.

The employer dismissed Mr Sinclair in December 2018 due to the ‘upset and friction’ caused to their ‘loyal workforce’.

The law

Having worked less than 2 years with the employer, Mr Sinclair did not have sufficient length of service to bring a claim for ordinary unfair dismissal.

Mr Sinclair brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal under a law which permits any employee to make a claim where the ‘reason or principal reason’ for their dismissal is because they carried out activities ‘in connection with preventing or reducing risks to health and safety at work’, where their employer had ‘designated’ them to carry out those activities (section 100 (1)(a) Employment Rights Act, 1996).

At the Employment Tribunal

It was not disputed that Mr Sinclair was asked by his employer to carry out activities in connection with preventing risks to health and safety and that he had carried out those activities. The Tribunal had to consider whether the sole or principal reason for dismissal, was that Mr Sinclair carried out those activities.

Mr Sinclair reasoned that where an employer dismisses an employee because they were the subject of ‘embellished or exaggerated accounts of misconduct’ from colleagues while carrying out health and safety duties, then the employer is effectively dismissing the employee for carrying out health and safety duties.

The Tribunal needed to decide on the facts whether the dismissal was due to Mr Sinclair justifiably carrying out designated health and safety duties, or whether it was because he caused friction with colleagues.

The Tribunal concluded that the dismissal was due to the manner in which Mr Sinclair carried out his duties, and the demoralising effect it had on his colleagues. Mr Sinclair appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision

The Employment Appeal Tribunal overturned the Employment Tribunal’s decision.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal explained that section 100(1)(a) gives broad protection to employees who carry out health and safety activities at their employer’s request. Carrying out these activities will often be met with resistance from colleagues, but it would undermine the protection that the law affords to employees if an employer could rely upon the upset caused by legitimate activities as a reason for dismissal that was unrelated to the activity.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal said that only where an employee’s conduct was ‘wholly unreasonable, malicious or irrelevant to the task in hand’, could protection potentially be lost.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal highlighted the context that this employer, which was operating in a ‘health and safety critical environment’, had an impeccable health and safety record and was obligated to adhere to exacting health and safety standards in order to operate. Mr Sinclair was not asked to alter his approach when he reported his colleagues’ resistance to management.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal decided Mr Sinclair had diligently carried out his duties, and his colleagues’ perception that he was carrying out his duties in an ‘over-zealous way’ was due to the employer’s mismanagement of the situation. The Employment Appeal Tribunal found that the dismissal had been unfair.

Conclusion

This case demonstrates the importance of employers clearly communicating how health and safety changes will be implemented. Employers should fully inform employees who are requested to give colleagues instructions about new processes, the approach they are expected to take and how to respond to challenge.

If employees are not kept updated on changes to health and safety measures, the employer could face legal claims if the health and safety of employees is not adequately protected, due to ambiguous instructions, or if discontent amongst employees leads to dismissals/resignations. It is also much more difficult to hold employees accountable for breaches of safety rules if instructions were not clear from the outset.

We can discuss the implementation of policies and training with you, to help minimise the risk of legal claims and unnecessary friction in the workplace.

If you are an employer with questions about the implementation of new policies, or if you have an employee conflict or issue you need guidance on, then we can help. Please call us on 01243 836840 for a no obligation chat, or email us at [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Discrimination found in gender critical belief case 27th July 2022
  • Court of Appeal overturns Tesco fire and rehire injunction 27th July 2022
  • Changes to fit notes 27th July 2022
  • Where are we with the fire and rehire Code of Practice? 27th July 2022
  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only