• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Unreasonable investigations – a follow up

22 January 2020

Difficult meeting

The way an employer deals with the investigation into allegations of gross misconduct and what amounts to unreasonable behaviour by the employer during the investigation process, has been the subject of further consideration, this time from the Employment Appeal Tribunal in the recent case of Retirement Security Ltd v Miss A Wilson

In the above case, it was confirmed that the way in which an investigatory process is conducted by an employer, can lead to a finding of constructive unfair dismissal against them, if they behave in a way which fundamentally damages the relationship of trust and confidence with the employee.

The background

The Claimant, Miss Wilson, had been working for the employer, Retirement Security Ltd, for 3 years in the role of Registered Manager. She was in charge of managing one of their retirement ‘courts’ (a 42-apartment property).

In January 2018, the Claimant’s Services Manager, was made aware of concerns about her, expressed by four of the five duty managers, three of whom then made formal complaints. She was almost immediately suspended from her role, pending investigation into the allegations.

The invitation to the investigation, which was sent to the wrong address which delayed receipt, gave headings of concerns, which were serious in nature, but did not give detail of the specific allegations. Examples included;

  • owner safety
  • illegal deprivation of liberty
  • confidentiality
  • alleged theft
  • not following internal accounting procedures – petty cash
  • neglect
  • concerns from directors
  • not following direct instructions
  • improper leadership.

The Claimant described that the 2-hour investigatory meeting left her feeling like she was ‘under police investigation’. At the end of the meeting, she was told a report would be sent to her legal advisers and it appears it was intimated to her that this would give her 24 hours to consider if she wanted to resign, with a reference.

Miss Wilson believed that her employer had already concluded that she was guilty of gross misconduct, having made serious allegations at the meeting but shown her limited information to justify the concerns. She felt her employer had no confidence in her ability and had not given her fair opportunity to answer the allegations. In the meeting she accepted she had made some mistakes that she could learn from but did not believe the employer wanted her to continue in her employment. She said she had not knowingly put anyone at risk and did not consider the investigation had been handled fairly. Given the lack of a fair procedure in dealing with her to that point, she considered she would face an unjustified dismissal in the circumstances, and so felt that if she was to continue working in the sector her only option was to resign. She resigned the morning after the meeting.

What was wrong with the investigation process?

A list of serious allegations were provided to the Claimant in the invitation letter to the investigation meeting, but little evidence was given to substantiate it, and even though the employer had said that full details of the evidence would be given in the investigatory meeting, they were not.

The Respondent was criticised by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) for not providing statements and important pieces of evidence that they had access to and had referred to. The EAT felt they could have provided redacted witness statements. The Claimant had only been given 24 hours to prepare before the investigation meeting.

The EAT concluded that:

“although the way in which an investigatory meeting (or, more generally, an investigation process) is to be conducted will depend on the particular circumstances of the case, if, without reasonable and proper cause, the employer thereby acts in a manner likely to destroy or seriously damage the relationship of confidence and trust, it would be a fundamental breach of contract. That is what the Employment Tribunal found had happened here.”

Conclusion

Employers need to be careful that during an investigation process, the employee is not treated in a manner which could destroy the trust and confidence between employer and employee. Even if the employer feels that the initial evidence in the investigation points towards gross misconduct, they should treat the employee in a dignified way, and be prepared to listen to their response to allegations. Employers should not unreasonably withhold evidence that is in their possession and upon which they wish to base serious allegations.

If you would like us at Pure to assist you with any investigations, then please get in touch with any member of the Pure Employment Law team on 01243 836840 or [email protected]. You can also find out more about how we can help on our Investigations, Hearings and Appeals page.

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
  • Employer unfairly counted disability-related absences when dismissing 29th June 2022
  • Did an Employment Tribunal correctly award an uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code in a sham redundancy case? 29th June 2022
  • Without prejudice negotiations – what is unambiguous impropriety? 29th June 2022
  • Does referring to a man’s baldness at work amount to sexual harassment? 25th May 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only