• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

TUPE – changes to terms are void even where they are in an employee’s favour

29 May 2020

Person signing a document

There’s an old saying in life that if something appears to be too good to be true, then it probably is!

Under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE), all employees employed in an undertaking which is transferring to a new employer do so on their existing terms and conditions of employment and with continuity of service.  As is well known, TUPE can apply on the commercial sale or transfer of a part or whole of a business or other entity, as well as where a contract for the provision of services transfers from one contractor to another.  This latter service provision transfer often occurs without the outgoing contractor wanting it to, but rather because the person to whom they were providing services has decided to award the contract to a new provider.

This is what happened in the case of Ferguson and others v Astrea Asset Management Limited.  The four Claimants were all directors, employees and shareholders in an estate management company, LPAM Limited.  LPAM’s only contract was with Berkeley Square Estate, which owned substantial property assets in Knightsbridge and Mayfair.  LPAM provided property management services to Berkeley Estate.  In September 2017 Berkeley Estate gave LPAM 12 months’ notice to terminate their contract, and with effect from September 2018 awarded the contract to Astrea Asset Management Limited (Astrea).  All parties accepted that this was a TUPE transfer, and therefore all four Claimants, as employees of LPAM, would transfer to Astrea.

In the summer of 2018 the four Claimants, no doubt anticipating that Astrea would terminate their employment, came up with a cunning plan.  They decided to amend their contracts of employment so as to give them a guaranteed annual bonus of 50% of their annual salary, a generous termination payment if their employment was terminated, and increased their notice period from the employer to 2 years.  These were therefore the terms of employment immediately before the transfer, and as such, on the face of it, the terms which Astrea, as the transferee, would inherit.  The transfer duly went ahead, and shortly afterwards Astrea dismissed all four Claimants.  Astrea refused to pay them their increased notice or the termination payments which the individuals had written into their contracts.  The four Claimants brought various claims in the Employment Tribunal, including in respect of the enhanced notice and the termination payments.

The Employment Tribunal found that, on the facts, there was no commercial reason for LPAM to make the amendments to the contracts, and that the only reason that they were made was because of the impending transfer.  Under TUPE, any changes to an employee’s contract of employment which are made where the sole or principal reason for the change is the transfer are void.  The Tribunal held that the sole reason for the variation was the transfer, and therefore the changes made by the four claimants were void.

TUPE was designed to protect employees’ rights when their employment transfers from one party to another, and the provision which makes changes to contractual terms void is designed to protect the employee from adverse changes to their terms of employment.  However, the wording in the Regulations applies to any changes, not just ones which were adverse to the employees.  The Claimants appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, but the appeal was unsuccessful.

The cunning plan therefore failed!

In the vast majority of situations there is unlikely to be a dispute about terms which are advantageous to an employee. However, the case is useful clarification of the fact that if a change to terms (either positive or negative) is for a reason related to a TUPE transfer, then it will strictly speaking be void.

If you are dealing with a situation involving TUPE, then we can help. Please call us on 01243 836840 for a no obligation chat, or email us at [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • What to expect during 2021 – employment law developments 21st January 2021
  • Did “office banter” about an employee’s memory amount to age discrimination? 21st January 2021
  • Update on Furlough 20th January 2021
  • Restricting Restrictive Covenants? 20th January 2021
  • Q&A: What to expect from a remote Tribunal hearing 20th January 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only