• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Too old to get qualified? The odyssey continues for Mr Homer

22nd May 2012

The Supreme Court recently gave judgment on the cases of Seldon and Homer on the same day. In all the reports about the Seldon case, the case of Homer got slightly lost. Admittedly the implications are not quite as wide-ranging as Seldon’s, but it is still an important age discrimination case that employers should be aware of.

Mr Homer worked for the Police National Legal Database (PNLD) as a legal adviser. He was not degree qualified, but had significant experience from having previously been a Detective Inspector within the police.

In 2006 the PNLD created a career structure under which there were three tiers for the legal adviser role. The third (top) tier was only available to employees with a law degree. At that time, Mr Homer was 62 and the normal retirement age within the PNLD was 65. It would have taken him at least 4 years to complete a degree on a part-time basis.

Mr Homer therefore claimed that in denying him the top tier, the PNLD had indirectly discriminated against him due to his age, on the basis that those over 60 were less likely to be able to achieve the top tier.

Indirect discrimination is where a rule (“provision, criterion or practice”) is applied to everyone, but has a disproportionate impact on people with a particular characteristic.

The Supreme Court were required to consider whether this was capable of amounting to age discrimination, and if so, whether it could be justified where it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

The PNLD argued that they had introduced the requirement as part of a career structure in order to recruit and retain the staff of the right calibre for the role. The Court of Appeal had held that it was not Mr Homer’s age that had prevented him from getting to the top tier – it was his retirement, and that there was a difference. The Supreme Court disagreed, finding that the two are inextricably linked. Therefore Mr Homer was indirectly discriminated against – but then the focus turned to whether that discrimination could be justified.

The Supreme Court concluded that there were a wider range of aims that could justify indirect age discrimination as compared with direct age discrimination (as shown by the decision in the Homer case, where to justify direct discrimination an employer would need to show a public policy objective).

They sent the case back to the Employment Tribunal for consideration of whether the justification test was met in the circumstances. In particular, the judgment comments that to make an exception for someone with Mr Homer’s skills and experience may result in discrimination against a younger candidate, so the Tribunal will need to take that into account when considering the issue of justification.

We will of course report back on the decision of the Employment Tribunal in due course. In the meantime, it is best for employers to give careful consideration for any specific role requirements which are introduced, as these can create other discrimination issues such as sex as well as age. For example, in the situation with Mr Homer it may have been possible to have a high level of experience as equivalent to a law degree.

For a copy of the Supreme Court’s judgment, please click here.

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team on 01243 836840 or [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2012-05-22 11:23:022014-12-03 16:43:13Too old to get qualified? The odyssey continues for Mr Homer

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
  • Employer unfairly counted disability-related absences when dismissing 29th June 2022
  • Did an Employment Tribunal correctly award an uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code in a sham redundancy case? 29th June 2022
  • Without prejudice negotiations – what is unambiguous impropriety? 29th June 2022
  • Does referring to a man’s baldness at work amount to sexual harassment? 25th May 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only