• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Three things the Johnny Depp case teaches us about Employment Tribunal litigation

4 November 2020

Image of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

As you will almost certainly have seen in the news, Hollywood star Johnny Depp has lost his libel case against the Sun. The newspaper had referred to him as a ‘wife beater’ because of allegations made by his ex-wife Amber Heard. After hearing weeks of evidence over the summer, High Court judge Mr Justice Nicol has concluded that there had been no libel, because the Sun had successfully showed that the words used were ‘substantially true’.

Although libel law is quite different from employment law, and despite the fact that I’ve yet to deal with a case involving A-list actors, I felt the case illustrated a number of important points that often crop up in Employment Tribunal cases. (They probably also come up in other forms of litigation too!)

Choosing to fight to ‘clear your name’ in a public forum can be risky

In my experience it is fairly common for both employers and employees to say that they want to bring or contest an employment case because they want to clear their name. That was exactly what Johnny Depp said he wanted to do, and the case was a good illustration of the risks of taking that approach!

Obviously most employment matters are nowhere near as high profile as Johnny Depp’s claim, which has been covered in the media around the world. Also, the cost of litigation was no object for either him or the Sun. However, in ordinary Employment Tribunal matters all cases, hearings and judgments are still a matter of public record, and you never know when the press or public may take an interest. Plus the costs of litigation can snowball, particularly in complex and lengthy cases such as discrimination or whistleblowing.

The general view seems to be that the evidence which came out during Johnny Depp’s case did not show either him or Amber Heard in a particularly favourable light, and this can happen in employment cases too.

Both employers and employees should bear in mind that even where they succeed in litigation, sometimes the victory may not be worth the cost, time commitment, or damage to reputation. There are always other options to consider, such as forms of alternative dispute resolution.

You may have to disclose things that embarrass you

Johnny Depp’s case obviously involved his private life, so it is perhaps understandable that at the time in question, the people involved were not always conscious of the fact that their private messages, documents and even CCTV could all potentially be scrutinised at some point in the future.

An employment context is clearly very different, and the parties, especially employers, should be much more on their guard. However despite this, time and time again we have seen cases where employers or employees have said things in an email or message which come back to haunt them in subsequent litigation.

The test for disclosure in the Employment Tribunal is that the parties have an ongoing duty to disclose documents they wish to rely upon in the case, as well as documents which adversely affect their case, adversely affect another party’s case, or support another party’s case. There are only a few limited exceptions to the duty of disclosure (such as correspondence for the purposes of taking legal advice) so my rule of thumb for employers is always “don’t put anything in writing which you wouldn’t want a Tribunal to see.” That includes social media and any kind of messaging, as well as letters and emails.

Witness statements are absolutely crucial

One of the things that let Johnny Depp down when he was giving his evidence was that when questioned, he admitted he wasn’t familiar with all of the contents of his witness statement. He reportedly said:

“Had I read the entire statement after the lawyers had drafted it, I would have found that missing piece. I am sure that I read some of it. I do not know that I read it all. I am sorry, I trusted my attorneys.”

This kind of thing will never go down well with a court or Employment Tribunal. The witness statement is supposed to be the mainstay of a witness’s evidence, and needs to accurately reflect their version of what happened in their own words. It is not unusual for lawyers to produce draft witness statements for witnesses, and there is nothing wrong with that. However, it is still always the responsibility of each individual witness to go through the draft, ensure that there are no key points omitted, and amend it if necessary so that they are happy with everything in their statement. Any issues with the accuracy of the statement could seriously damage the witness’s credibility in the eyes of any court or Tribunal.

It is also best to make sure that before any hearing takes place, the witnesses are all as familiar as possible with the contents of their statement and the key documents in the bundle and that they are fully briefed on what giving evidence will be like. That way, the witness should feel as relaxed and prepared as possible, which is much more likely to help them give their evidence clearly and effectively.

If you are an employer dealing with an Employment Tribunal claim, then we can help. Please call us on 01243 836840 for a no obligation chat, or email us at [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Uber loses in the Supreme Court – their drivers are ‘workers’ 24th February 2021
  • Did ‘stale’ equality training leave an employer without a defence to discrimination? 24th February 2021
  • Dismissal for social media comments – the importance of investigation 24th February 2021
  • Case Study – Investigation 3rd February 2021
  • What to expect during 2021 – employment law developments 21st January 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only