• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

The vanishing dismissal

25th August 2016/in News /by Nicola Brown

Where an employee is dismissed after a disciplinary procedure, they should have a right to appeal against that decision. This right to appeal is part of the ACAS Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance, and is also likely to be set out in an employer’s disciplinary procedure or policy. The procedure may permit the employer to substitute an alternative disciplinary sanction at appeal stage, such as demotion or the imposition of a final written warning.

Unless an employee makes it clear that they are seeking some other outcome, when a dismissed employee appeals against their dismissal it is implicit that they are asking their employer to find that the dismissal decision was wrong and to return them to their job. A successful appeal will usually involve paying the employee back-dated pay from the date they were dismissed to the date they start back at work, i.e. putting them in the position as if they had not been dismissed.

This all seems straightforward! However, sometimes things can become a bit more complicated, as shown in the recent case of Folkestone Nursing Home Ltd v Patel which was heard in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).

In this case, Mr Patel was dismissed for gross misconduct following allegations that he had slept on the job and falsified residents’ records. The decision to dismiss was taken by an external consultant who conducted the disciplinary hearing. Mr Patel appealed against the decision to dismiss. He said he was sleeping during his rest break, and that he had been unable to complete the daily record sheets because of an interruption. After an appeal hearing (which was heard by an external manager of the care home), it was decided that the decision to dismiss Mr Patel should be revoked. A letter was sent to Mr Patel to confirm this decision and said that someone would be in touch to arrange his return to work. However, the letter only referred to revocation of the allegation that Mr Patel had slept on the job, and made no reference to the second allegation about falsifying residents’ records. Mr Patel was not satisfied with this as he felt he was owed a full explanation, and so he did not return to work. He then raised claims in the Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal.

The Employment Tribunal found that there had been a dismissal. The Employment Judge said that the “revocation” of dismissal in the letter was unclear and left out significant issues.

The care home appealed this decision to the EAT. At this stage, the care home relied on a former EAT case which had similar circumstances (Salmon v (1) Castlebeck Care (Teesdale) Ltd (In Administration) (2) Danshell Healthcare Ltd and others (2014)), in which it had been decided that the employee had succeeded in their appeal, and there had been no need for the outcome of the appeal to have been communicated to the employee for it to be effective.

The EAT agreed with the appeal (referring to the Salmon case above) and found that the decision of the Employment Tribunal was wrong – the appeal letter had made it clear enough that the decision to dismiss had been revoked, even it did not go into enough depth about why this decision had been taken. Therefore, Mr Patel had not been dismissed and his claim for unfair dismissal could not be heard.

As an aside, because his appeal failed usually Mr Patel would have had to pay the fees the care home had to pay in order to raise their appeal in the EAT. However, the EAT decided that Mr Patel would not have to pay the fees because the care home (represented by an external company who they engaged for HR advice) had failed to address the point about whether Mr Patel had been dismissed in preliminary hearings, and also failed to bring the Salmon case to the attention of the Employment Tribunal. As a result, the EAT said the case had been made more complex than it needed to be.

All of this could probably have been avoided had the appeal letter been clearer about why the decision was made to bring Mr Patel back to work. That said, most employees will be unhappy if they have been dismissed, and as such any appeal which changes the original decision made in a disciplinary should be handled carefully.

In this case, the appeal decision completely revoked the disciplinary decision (so Mr Patel would have returned to work with a clean slate). However, where an employer decides to apply an alternative sanction to dismissal on appeal, the nature of the alternative sanction may be such that, while the original dismissal disappears, the employee may then be entitled to treat themselves as constructively dismissed.

Mr Patel has applied for permission to appeal the decision to the Court of Appeal, so there may be more news on this case in the future. We will of course, keep you updated if anything significant comes out of any appeal!

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.

 

 

Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2016-08-25 08:27:012017-11-23 15:16:17The vanishing dismissal

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • FAQs about COT3s 18th December 2020
  • Can an employer withdraw a notice of redundancy? 18th December 2020
  • Will employers be able to insist that staff have the Covid-19 vaccination? 18th December 2020
  • Furlough over Christmas? 18th December 2020
  • Update – Furlough scheme extended 18th December 2020
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only