• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill – what does it mean for employers?

28th June 2012/in News /by Nicola Brown

Following various ‘calls for evidence’ and consultation exercises, the Government has finally decided which of its proposals to reform employment law it wishes to pursue. The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill is currently going through the committee stage in Parliament, and no doubt there will be some amendments made before the provisions apply, but many of the items in the Bill have potentially far-reaching implications for employment law.

The main employment law issues dealt with in the Bill are as follows:

Changes to the compensatory award for unfair dismissal

This is one of the most significant changes, yet it has been tucked away in the detail of the Bill and has not attracted the attention it deserves.

If the Bill is passed as it is currently drafted, the Secretary of State will have the power to change the maximum compensatory award. The new limit can be changed to a set amount, a certain number of weeks’ pay or the lower of the two. If a set amount is used, the Bill states that it cannot be lower than the median annual earnings or higher than three times the median annual earnings, and if a number of weeks’ pay is used, the minimum number which can be specified is 52. The Secretary of State would also have a power to specify different maximum compensatory awards for different types of employer, which could allow different rules to apply for small businesses.

So what does this mean in real terms? The current cap on the compensatory award in unfair dismissal cases is £72,300. Based on the current median earnings in the UK, the Secretary of State could potentially lower the maximum compensatory award to as little as £26,000. That would have a dramatic effect on the effectiveness of an unfair dismissal claim, particularly for higher earners.

Compulsory pre-claim conciliation through ACAS

ACAS currently have an obligation to conciliate in all Employment Tribunal cases, but it is still relatively unusual for the parties to be able to use ACAS conciliation before a claim is issued. The idea of compulsory pre-claim conciliation is that a prospective Claimant will be required to submit details of their claim to ACAS before they bring a claim. No detail has been given as yet about how the prospective Respondent will be able to put across their version of events. ACAS will then conciliate for a specified period (the details of which have not been announced yet, but will be detailed in regulations) or until they feel there is no prospect of a settlement being reached.

This is of course yet another measure designed to reduce the burden on the Tribunal system, and most people would agree that this is a good thing. However, for those of us who remember the statutory dispute resolution procedures from the Employment Act 2002, and the fixed conciliation period that came with them, compulsory conciliation seems to be a re-hash of an idea which did not work the first time around. We will of course need to wait and see how this takes shape once the details become known.

Rapid Resolution

The idea here is that simple Tribunal claims can be dealt with by “legal officers” rather than judges or Tribunal panels. As the Bill currently stands, rapid resolution would only apply if both parties consent in writing – presumably it would involve a shorter waiting time than a full hearing with a judge.

Financial Penalties for Employers

As we covered previously both in our updates and in our January seminars on the reforms, another measure the Government are keen to introduce in order to reduce the number of Tribunal claims is imposing penalties on employers who lose. The provisions in the Bill are very similar to those on which the Government was previously consulting, but rather than being compulsory, the decision on whether to impose a penalty will be a matter for the Tribunal’s discretion depending on whether there are any ‘aggravating features’ in the case. This is not defined, but the Guidance to the Bill states that aggravating features could include where actions are deliberate or malicious, where the employer had a dedicated HR team, or where the right had been breached on more than one occasion. If a financial penalty is imposed, it will be at 50% of the compensation awarded to the Claimant, with a minimum of £100 and maximum of £5,000. There is a discount of 50% if the penalty is paid within 21 days.

Whistleblowing needs to be in the public interest

Claims relating to whistleblowing are brought under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998, but despite the name of the Act, there is not necessarily a requirement for the whistleblowing to have a public interest element in order for the whistleblower to benefit from the protection it gives.

In particular the case of Parkins v Sodexho came in for criticism from employers because it established that an employee could attract whistleblower status purely for raising issues about potential breaches of his own contract of employment. It has been argued that this is not within the spirit of the Act, and this appears to be the motivation for the change. However, some commentators have argued that the changes go too far – rather than simply dealing with the Parkins v Sodexho type cases, they would also discourage genuine disclosures about internal wrongdoing within private businesses, which would not necessarily meet the requirement for ‘public interest’.

Settlement Agreements

The Bill would re-name Compromise Agreements as ‘Settlement Agreements’ and would also introduce standard form documents and letters. For more information about these proposals please see our article on Settlement Agreements here.

All in all, the Bill will probably be considered good news for employers, as it intends to try and reduce the number of claims – but with every change comes uncertainty of how the new rules will be interpreted. We will of course keep you updated on the progress of the Bill and when (or if!) these proposals become law.

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team on 01243 836840 or [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2012-06-28 09:53:252014-12-03 15:51:48The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill – what does it mean for employers?

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • What to expect during 2021 – employment law developments 21st January 2021
  • Did “office banter” about an employee’s memory amount to age discrimination? 21st January 2021
  • Update on Furlough 20th January 2021
  • Restricting Restrictive Covenants? 20th January 2021
  • Q&A: What to expect from a remote Tribunal hearing 20th January 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only