• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Secret recordings

28th March 2013

Recording conversations or meetings is easy these days – mobile phones, music players and tablets all have the ability to record sound at the touch of a button. Trouble can arise when employees secretly record meetings or conversations and then seek to use this material as evidence in their Employment Tribunal claim. Likewise it is becoming increasingly common for employers to record meetings (usually with the consent of the employee).

In the recent case of Vaughan v London Borough of Lewisham (2013), Mrs Vaughan had recorded 39 hours of conversations with her managers and colleagues onto a dictaphone (with the files then transferred to her iPod). She sought to admit this as evidence in her Employment Tribunal case, saying it would prove the Council were lying, but the Employment Judge ruled she could not admit this evidence. In making this decision, the Employment Judge was mindful of costs given that Mrs Vaughan had not transcribed the recordings or highlighted the areas that she felt would prove that the Council were lying, as she had alleged.

Mrs Vaughan appealed against this decision to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). The EAT stressed that it is established in case law that secret recordings are not inadmissible simply because the way in which they were taken may be regarded as discreditable. However, in this particular case the EAT agreed with the Employment Judge about not admitting the evidence, but found that his reasoning was not quite correct. The EAT said that the Employment Judge had not been able to form any view on the relevance of the recordings because Mrs Vaughan had simply said they were relevant, but had refused to provide the recordings to the Council prior to her application to admit them, nor had they been fully transcribed.

The EAT referred generally to the practice of secret recordings as “very distasteful”, even though the EAT accepted that employees such as Mrs Vaughan will say that it is a necessary step in order to expose injustice. The EAT gave felt that Mrs Vaughan should have produced transcripts and provided these to the Council and Tribunal so it could be seen if there were any parts that were irrelevant (which is likely where there are 39 hours worth!). They also said Mrs Vaughan should have given the Council access to the recordings to assess the accuracy of the transcripts. The Council could have then used a third party to transcribe the recordings if there had been any dispute over accuracy. The ruling on her evidence may have been different if she had made a thorough application, citing particular parts of her recordings and highlighting why these were relevant to her case.

To avoid such issues, many employers are choosing to record meetings themselves and supply copies of the recordings to employees. There is no legal obligation to do so, but there is something to be said for this approach. However, this should only be done if the employee agrees to this and ideally their consent should be sought well in advance of the meeting. Employees may also ask to bring their own recording device as well, which should usually be allowed where the employer is making a recording.

Whether or not the decision is taken to record a meeting, it is always prudent to take detailed notes of a meeting and it can be helpful to have a person present at the meeting with the specific role of note-taking. This all forms part of the evidence trail! Employers should train managers dealing with meetings such as disciplinaries, grievances, etc so that they are always aware that everything that happens at such meetings can form part of the evidence in an Employment Tribunal claim.

We can help with advice about recording meetings, and can also provide training for managers on handling disciplinary and grievance issues. For advice on this or any other aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2013-03-28 08:43:472014-12-03 15:39:25Secret recordings

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Discrimination found in gender critical belief case 27th July 2022
  • Court of Appeal overturns Tesco fire and rehire injunction 27th July 2022
  • Changes to fit notes 27th July 2022
  • Where are we with the fire and rehire Code of Practice? 27th July 2022
  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only