• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Retirement – is it a dirty word?

23rd January 2013

Since the default retirement age was abolished in April 2011, employers have been left in an uncertain position where retirement is concerned. Asking an employee about their retirement plans could lead them to accuse you of discrimination – so what are employers supposed to do when they need to know?

This point was dealt with in the recent Employment Tribunal case of Quick v Cornwall Council and another.

In this case, Mrs Quick was headteacher at a primary school in Cornwall. The local council wanted to try and amalgamate several local schools to try to save costs, and this would have resulted in losing some teachers.

Mrs Quick had several periods of absence and some disciplinary allegations were made against her. A hearing took place and the school’s governors decided to dismiss her with notice on 19 July 2011 on the basis of her serious misconduct and because of an irretrievable breakdown in trust. She appealed against this decision, but was unsuccessful.

Mrs Quick then brought an Employment Tribunal claim. As well as unfair dismissal she brought in allegations of age discrimination, which she had not mentioned previously. She referred to colleagues asking her if she had any plans to retire, emails from the Governors where her age (59) was referenced, and other references to retirement such as “too many people carry on after they should have retired.” Many of the allegations had occurred back in 2008.

At the Employment Tribunal, they considered Mrs Quick’s claims. Her unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. In terms of her age discrimination claim, the Tribunal found the following:

  • Given the planned amalgamation, it was sensible for the ages of current staff to be considered as part of succession planning. Mrs Quick had herself made informal enquiries about retirement.
  • Discussions about potential retirement did not amount to less favourable treatment because there was no suggestion that retirement could be imposed.
  • Mrs Quick had never complained or raised a grievance about the alleged age discrimination and her union representative admitted that the first he had known about her age discrimination claim was when he saw her Employment Tribunal claim form.
  • The colleague who had asked about her retirement was doing so because her plans would affect his own career, and it did not therefore amount to less favourable treatment.

In the circumstances, the Employment Tribunal dismissed Mrs Quick’s claim for age discrimination. This case should therefore give some comfort to employers who want to raise this difficult issue with their employees. However, it is important to note that this case is Employment Tribunal level only, and therefore does not bind other Employment Tribunals – another Tribunal might decide the case differently. It also appears that the Tribunal were strongly influenced by Mrs Quick’s misconduct and the fact that she had not raised the issues previously.

Our Top Tips

In many workplaces, simply not addressing the question of retirement at all will lead to problems. For example, a bottleneck may build up where younger employees are waiting for an older employee to retire – if the issue is not discussed, it could cause resentment.

Employers are best advised to build discussions about every employee’s future plans into their appraisals – if you ask everyone about their future plans (e.g. “where do you see yourself in five years’ time?”) then it will not be discriminatory.

It is also a good idea to ensure that managers are trained on dealing with these issues and in particular that your equal opportunities training addresses retirement issues. If you need help with equal opportunities training, then please contact us.

The ACAS guide to Working without the default retirement age is very helpful and gives guidance on good and bad practice.

If you are having problems with retirement issues then we can help. Please call us on 01243 836840 for a no obligation chat or email us at [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2013-01-23 11:40:482014-12-03 16:45:52Retirement – is it a dirty word?

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Discrimination found in gender critical belief case 27th July 2022
  • Court of Appeal overturns Tesco fire and rehire injunction 27th July 2022
  • Changes to fit notes 27th July 2022
  • Where are we with the fire and rehire Code of Practice? 27th July 2022
  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only