• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Refusal to furlough was not unfair

24 June 2021

Scales of Justice image

An Employment Tribunal was recently required to consider whether an employee who raised health and safety concerns and said that he did not want to commute into or attend his workplace during lockdown was unfairly dismissed as a result. The decision shows that by taking a considered approach to employee concerns, employers can avoid successful unfair dismissal claims being made against them.

What were the facts?

In the case of Accattatis v Fortuna Group (London) Limited the employee, Mr Accattatis, worked as a Sales and Project Marketing Co-ordinator for his employer, which sold and distributed PPE. The context of the case was the coronavirus pandemic during the first wave of infections.

On 23 March 2020, the Prime Minister told the country that people ‘must’ stay at home and certain businesses must close, other than those delivering vital key services. The employer kept its business running to help deliver supplies of PPE.

Following Mr Accattatis having had time off due to experiencing Covid symptoms, he contacted his employer to say that instead of returning to the workplace, he wanted to either work from home or be put on furlough, because he did not feel safe using public transport or coming into the workplace.

The employer said his role could not be done from home and that the business was too busy to justify putting Mr Accattatis onto furlough, as there was plenty of work for him to do. An offer was made to all staff that they could take annual leave, or unpaid leave, but Mr Accattatis did not agree to this. Mr Accattatis was dismissed in April 2020 after repeating the request to his employer.

Applying the law

As Mr Accattatis had under two years’ service, he was not eligible to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim. Therefore, he sought to prove under section 100(1)(e) Employment Rights Act 1996, that the reason (or principal reason) for his dismissal was that:

“in circumstances of danger which the employee reasonably believed to be serious and imminent he took (or proposed to take) appropriate steps to protect himself or other persons from the danger”.

The Employment Judge accepted that Mr Accattatis reasonably believed there were circumstances of serious and imminent danger, both in the workplace and on his journey to work. However, they said he had not discussed the detail of the concerns he had with his employer and had not taken appropriate steps to avoid the danger.

The Employment Judge agreed that Mr Accattatis had duties which could not be done from home, that in March/April 2020 the company was very busy due to significant demand for PPE, and that it would not have been an appropriate step to put Mr Accattatis on furlough. Therefore, these steps had not been appropriate suggestions by Mr Accattatis to avoid the danger. There had been no attempt by Mr Accattatis to raise or discuss other ways to lessen the risk to health and safety.

The Employment Judge also concluded that the dismissal had been due to the employer considering Mr Accattatis a ‘challenging employee’, who had previously made ongoing complaints, and had written impertinently worded e-mails demanding to be furloughed or to work from home. The employer had ended the employment when it did to avoid Mr Accattatis gaining 2 years’ service, and therefore protection from ordinary unfair dismissal (which has a different legal standard of proof), rather than because Mr Accattatis was reluctant to come into work or use public transport.

Conclusion

The decision in this case is Tribunal level only, and therefore not binding on other Employment Tribunals. Inevitably it is based on the specific facts presented. It does show, however, that employees are unlikely to be able to refuse to attend work due to pandemic-related health and safety concerns, without clearly setting out what their concerns are to their employers. They will also need to consider and discuss with their employer any reasons why they feel that the steps that an employer has taken to address risk, are insufficient and/or not reasonable. This allows employers the chance to reflect on their measures and risk assessments and offer reassurance to employees.

If you have any employees who have raised concerns and you are not sure what to do next, we would be happy to discuss these with you.

If you are an employer dealing with a furlough issue, then we can help. Please call us on 01243 836840 for a no obligation chat, or email us at [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
  • Employer unfairly counted disability-related absences when dismissing 29th June 2022
  • Did an Employment Tribunal correctly award an uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code in a sham redundancy case? 29th June 2022
  • Without prejudice negotiations – what is unambiguous impropriety? 29th June 2022
  • Does referring to a man’s baldness at work amount to sexual harassment? 25th May 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only