• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Redundancy pooling

31st July 2014/in News /by Nicola Brown

In a redundancy exercise, often employers will need to place employees into a redundancy ‘pool’. This is usually based on those doing similar work, or those who work at similar levels. Employers then select who is to be made redundant from the pool using objective selection criteria. Case law has shown that employers have a wide discretion when it comes to determining the pool. Provided there is evidence that an employer has genuinely applied its mind to the choice of a pool, it will be difficult for an employee to challenge its choice of pool. However, in the case of Family Mosaic Housing Association v Badmos (2013) the choice of pool was challenged successfully.

Mr Badmos, who is from Nigeria, worked as a regional development manager for Family Mosaic Housing Association. There were three regional development managers who dealt with new business, and two regional development managers who dealt with delivery. Mr Badmos dealt with new business. In 2009, the Housing Association decided upon a restructure which would reduce the overall number of regional development managers from five to four. The delivery managers and new business managers were treated as having interchangeable skills, so Mr Badmos’s role was potentially redundant, even though his role was not one of the roles being considered for redundancy.

The Housing Association moved the goal posts at various times in the redundancy process. This culminated in the affected employees being asked to express a preference for either of the two types of role. The Housing Association indicated that if there were more preferences than posts available, a selection process would take place (including interview) to allocate the over-subscribed roles between the remaining employees in the pool. After the preferences were submitted by the employees, The Housing Association did have to follow an interview process but with only the three regional managers who dealt with new business (so the pool went from five to three). Mr Badmos received negative comments on his interview notes. The same person who had interviewed him wrote positive comments in respect of a new business manager being interviewed. The Housing Association then moved the goal posts once again. They had suggested that the selection process would entail an application form, interview, work-based task and psychometric testing, but they changed their minds and selected based on only the interview.

Mr Badmos was selected for redundancy. He appealed, unsuccessfully, against his dismissal. He then brought claims in the Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal and race discrimination.

The Employment Tribunal found that his dismissal was unfair and that his selection was also tainted with race discrimination. The Employment Judge was particularly critical of the way in which the Housing Association had changed the goal posts with regard to the pool.

The Housing Association appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). They argued that the Employment Tribunal had substituted its own view of how an employer should behave, in particular with regard to the pool, when making its decision. Mr Badmos argued that whatever the Employment Tribunal’s approach to the pool had been, the findings on unfair dismissal and race discrimination were sufficiently clear that they should stand.

The EAT agreed that the Employment Tribunal had substituted their own view with regard to the choice of pool, but agreed with Mr Badmos that there was still sufficient material to conclude that the unfair dismissal and race discrimination findings should stand.

The case is a lesson to employers that redundancy exercises should be carefully planned, with sufficient thought given to pooling and the way employees will be selected from the pool. The many changes made by the employer throughout the process certainly did not do them any favours in this case, and this could have easily have been avoided by proper planning at the start of the process.

Do you need advice on a redundancy exercise? We can help. Please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2014-07-31 09:27:302018-01-09 14:18:53Redundancy pooling

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • FAQs about COT3s 18th December 2020
  • Can an employer withdraw a notice of redundancy? 18th December 2020
  • Will employers be able to insist that staff have the Covid-19 vaccination? 18th December 2020
  • Furlough over Christmas? 18th December 2020
  • Update – Furlough scheme extended 18th December 2020
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only