• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Is an employer entitled to rely on Occupational Health advice about disability?

28 October 2019

Question marks

Employers often seek Occupational Health or other medical advice regarding the question of whether an employee meets the definition of disability – and they are usually right to do so. Although the question of whether someone meets the definition of disability is strictly speaking a legal one, it is best informed by medical advice. So what happens when the medical adviser gets it wrong – is the employer entitled to rely on that advice?

Background

The previous case law on this area suggested that wasn’t necessarily the case. As we covered in our previous article back in 2013, the case of Gallop v Newport City Council concluded that the employer should not have ‘unquestioningly’ adopted the advice of Occupational Health and that as a result, they were deemed to have knowledge of the employee’s disability (despite having been advised by Occupational Health on several occasions that the definition of disability was not met).

Kelly v Royal Mail Group

The case of Kelly v Royal Mail Group is a bit of a relief for employers. In the case, Mr Kelly was a postman who had a poor attendance record, partly due to carpal tunnel syndrome. He was taken through Royal Mail’s attendance policy and ultimately he was dismissed.

He then brought an Employment Tribunal claim for disability discrimination, along with some other claims. The Employment Tribunal dismissed his disability discrimination claim on the basis that Royal Mail had not known (i.e. they did not actually know, nor did they have reasonable grounds to know) about his disability. This was because the Occupational Health reports had concluded that he was not disabled.

Mr Kelly appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), saying that Royal Mail had simply unquestioningly relied upon the Occupational Health reports, i.e. using the argument from the Gallop case.

The EAT rejected his appeal. They felt that in this case the evidence showed that Royal Mail had given proper consideration to the Occupational Health reports regarding whether or not Mr Kelly met the definition of disability, meaning that reliance on the reports did not amount to a simple ‘rubber stamping exercise’. In addition, the reports were not just a bare statement that Mr Kelly was not disabled, they explained their reasoning for the conclusion.

Therefore, Royal Mail was not deemed to have known about Mr Kelly’s disability, meaning that it could not have discriminated against him because of it.

The EAT pointed out that “the Tribunal also noted, correctly, that an employer may attach considerable weight to the informed and reasoned opinion of an Occupational Health medical consultant in reaching its own assessment.”

Lessons for employers

This case is good news for employers who understandably wish to be able to rely upon the independent medical advice they receive.

However, for your organisation it is worth making sure:

  • that your independent medical reports are detailed as to the reasoning for the medical adviser’s conclusions – you can help to get this level of detail by asking the right questions of the adviser.
  • that you are able to show that you have not just ‘rubber stamped’ the advice you receive. There is no set way of doing this, but it may be worth keeping a file note showing that the report was given consideration, what factors were taken into account, and keeping records of any follow up questions asked.

If you are dealing with an employee who may or may not be disabled, then we can help. Please call us on 01243 836840 for a no obligation chat, or email us at [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • What to expect during 2021 – employment law developments 21st January 2021
  • Did “office banter” about an employee’s memory amount to age discrimination? 21st January 2021
  • Update on Furlough 20th January 2021
  • Restricting Restrictive Covenants? 20th January 2021
  • Q&A: What to expect from a remote Tribunal hearing 20th January 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only