• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Investigating alleged dishonesty – how far do you have to go?

30th August 2013

In January, we reported on the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in the case of Stuart v London City Airport [2012] – you can find that article here. You may recall that in that case the employer allegedly failed to interview potential witnesses or view CCTV recordings of the alleged dismissal.

Somewhat surprisingly, the finding from the EAT that the dismissal was unfair has been overturned by the Court of Appeal, which reinstated the finding from the original Employment Tribunal that the dismissal was fair. We look at the reasons why. The Court of Appeal’s judgment can be found here. There were a number of fact specific reasons for upholding the original Tribunal decision, for example that Mr Stuart had apparently not raised the issues about the company not speaking to witnesses or viewing the CCTV at the disciplinary or appeal hearings, but only when it came to the Employment Tribunal. His main argument at the time had been that he had never left the duty free department, which he subsequently admitted was not true. The Court of Appeal stated that where the employer had inspected the site where the alleged theft happened and concluded that the employee’s main argument was dishonest, it was reasonable for them not to consider CCTV footage in relation to the alleged concealment of the goods whilst the employee was in the shop. The employer formed a reasonable view themselves as to his credibility and so they did not have to go any further than that.

However, the most important reason for the Court of Appeal overturning the EAT’s decision was one of law.  The EAT can only overturn a Tribunal’s decision when there is an error of law (usually where the Tribunal asks itself the wrong questions) or where the Tribunal’s decision was perverse. In this case the EAT overturned the Tribunal’s decision on the grounds that it was perverse. The Tribunal is the arbiter of fact, and it is only when the conclusion drawn from those facts is one that no reasonable Tribunal could reach that a decision will be held to be perverse.

The Court of Appeal emphasised that both the EAT and the Court of Appeal “should be slow to overturn the decision of a Tribunal which has asked the right questions and come to a considered conclusion about them.”

Employers should not take this case as being authority for the proposition that it is not necessary to carry out a proper investigation into alleged misconduct.  The law requires there to be a reasonable investigation into alleged misconduct, and what that will amount to will of course very much depend on the specific facts of the case. What this case does illustrate is how difficult it can be to overturn a decision of a Tribunal where there has been no error of law.

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2013-08-30 11:14:342014-12-03 16:03:13Investigating alleged dishonesty – how far do you have to go?

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Discrimination found in gender critical belief case 27th July 2022
  • Court of Appeal overturns Tesco fire and rehire injunction 27th July 2022
  • Changes to fit notes 27th July 2022
  • Where are we with the fire and rehire Code of Practice? 27th July 2022
  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only