• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

I’m a celebrity; don’t get me out of here! – John McCririck loses age discrimination case

28th November 2013/in News /by Nicola Brown

Celebrity cases in the Employment Tribunals usually attract a lot of media attention.  The latest involved John McCririck, the former presenter of Channel 4 Racing, who lost his claim for age discrimination following a decision by Channel 4 not to retain him as a television presenter (John McCririck v Channel 4 Television Corporation and another (2013)). The Employment Tribunal decided that the decision not to retain Mr McCririck was because of his image and presenting style; not because of his age.

Mr McCririck had worked as a television presenter covering horse racing since 1981. In October 2012, Channel 4 decided not to retain him as a presenter going forwards. This decision was taken following a survey of public opinion of a number of presenters, in which Mr McCririck had scored badly. Mr McCririck was 72 years of age at the time. He pursued a claim for direct age discrimination against Channel 4 and the production company (Highflyer Productions) which held the contract to provide horse-racing coverage to Channel 4 and engaged the services of Mr McCririck. He was not able to pursue a claim for unfair dismissal since he was not an employee of either Channel 4 or Highflyer Productions.

Direct age discrimination occurs where, because of age, A treats B less favourably than A treats or would treat others. However, unlike with the other protected characteristics in the Equality Act 2010 (e.g. gender, race, disability), there will be no direct age discrimination where A can show that its treatment of B is a “proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.” To establish this, a ‘legitimate aim’ must be a social policy objective and have a public interest element. This means it cannot be just something relevant to a private business, such as preserving profits. Guidance on what could constitute a legitimate aim was set out by the Supreme Court in the case of Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership) (2012). Our articles on the Seldon case can be found here.

In this case, the Employment Tribunal held that Channel 4’s aim was to attract a wider audience to horse racing, and that this was a legitimate aim. It also held that Channel 4’s actions in not retaining Mr McCririck were a proportionate means of achieving this legitimate aim. The Employment Tribunal then concluded that the decision not to retain Mr McCririck was made for reasons other than age. The Employment Tribunal judgment said:

“Mr McCririck was dismissed because of his persona emanating from his appearances from celebrity television shows and the associated press articles resulting from them together with his appearances as a broadcaster on Channel 4 Racing where, as he accepted, his style of dress, attitudes, opinions and tic tac gestures were not in keeping with the new aims, and his opinions seen as arrogant and confrontational.”

Interestingly, the decision is contrary to a previous successful direct age discrimination claim brought by Miriam O’Reilly against the BBC (O’Reilly v British Broadcasting Corporation and another (2010)). This claim followed the removal of Ms O’Reilly as a presenter of Countryfile when she was 51 years of age. In this case, the Employment Tribunal held that the presenter’s age was a significant factor in the BBC’s decision and, although its wish to appeal to younger viewers was a legitimate aim, the removal of older presenters to pander to assumed prejudices of viewers was not a proportionate means of achieving that aim.

Given the above, Mr McCririck may decide to appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal although he has not said whether he will or not as yet.

The decision does show that it is possible to defend claims for direct age discrimination if it can be shown that age was not a significant factor in a decision to dismiss or terminate the services of an individual. However, matters such as these should be carefully handled and it usually best to seek advice. Another factor to consider is the possibility of a claim for indirect age discrimination. Indirect age discrimination is where a provision, criteria or practice puts (or would put) persons of a particular age or age group at a particular disadvantage when compared to other persons. An example of this can be found in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] . Our article on this case can be found here. Mr McCririck did not bring this type of claim so it was not a relevant factor to his case.

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2013-11-28 11:10:422015-06-02 01:39:01I’m a celebrity; don’t get me out of here! – John McCririck loses age discrimination case

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Fire and rehire – what does it mean and is it lawful? 30th March 2021
  • Sleeping on the job – Sleep-in workers not entitled to National Minimum Wage 30th March 2021
  • Do your contracts need updating post lockdown? 30th March 2021
  • What are Vento bands and what are the latest rates? 30th March 2021
  • Tribunal rates and compensation limits from 6 April 2021 17th March 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only