• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Holiday and sickness – yet more news!

29th November 2011

In this article we look at two recent decisions – one in the Employment Appeal Tribunal and another in the European Court of Justice, and how they affect an employee’s holiday entitlement when they are on long-term sickness absence.

The general rule in relation to holiday pay is clear; an employee (or worker) must actually take their entitlement to holiday leave during the leave year to receive payment for it, and an employee is unable to carry over such entitlement into the next leave year (i.e. ‘use it or lose it’).

This rule is altered where the employee has not “had the opportunity” to take their leave as a result of sickness absence. In these cases, the employee should be entitled to carry over their entitlement into the next leave year or receive payment for it upon termination of their employment. This was established in the cases of Stringer and Pereda (and covered in our previous updates here). This seems straightforward enough, although many people still struggle with the concept that those who are off sick are entitled to holiday. 

However, in the recent case of Fraser v Southwest London St George’s Mental Health Trust which was heard in the Employment Appeal Tribunal, a claim for such payment relating to a number of previous years of holiday pay where the employee had been on long-term sickness absence was rejected on the basis that the employee in question had not given notice of intention to take her leave entitlement and receive payment for this. Notice is required in regulation 15 of the Working Time Regulations.

The employee tried to overcome this point by pleading that her employers should have made her aware of this requirement, but this was overruled on the basis that employers are not generally required to make an employee aware of his or her statutory rights. Employers are of course responsible for providing employees with details of their terms and conditions of employment, but this duty does not necessarily extend as far as pointing out the employees’ rights. 

Please note that the decision in this case does conflict with a previous decision in the case of NHS Leeds v Larner [2011] which said that such notice is not required in order for the carryover of untaken leave. The Larner case is set for further consideration by the Court of Appeal later in 2011 or early 2012 and may determine the final position. We will of course keep you updated on developments.

Another key judgment on this topic was issued last week by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the German case of KHS v Schulte. Under German law, accrued leave must be taken within the calendar year, and carry forward of leave is only permitted where there are operational reasons, or “compelling” reasons relating to the individual. If carry forward takes place, the leave carried forward must be taken within 3 months of the end of the calendar year. In this case there was also a collective agreement stating that in the case of illness, leave would lapse 15 months after the end of the calendar year.

The ECJ found that a worker who is off sick for a considerable period cannot have the right to continue to accumulate leave indefinitely during that period, as this would no longer reflect the purpose of the Working Time Directive. The ECJ distinguished between two purposes for annual leave – firstly, to give a worker a rest from work and secondly, to give a period of relaxation and leisure. In the Court’s view, beyond a certain point leave would cease to be a rest period and would then only be relevant as relaxation and leisure, which was not the intention of the Working Time Directive.

The ECJ then went on to find that 15 months was a reasonable period after which annual leave would cease to constitute a rest period. It was emphasised that carry forward must take account of the worker’s individual circumstances and the carry forward period must be substantially longer than the period in which that leave had accrued.

Unfortunately the Schulte case leaves a lot of unanswered questions here in the UK where the Working Time Regulations do not permit carrying forward any leave at all. It is not clear how this decision would be applied in practice. Some employers might want to include a specific provision to state that those on long-term sickness absence will only be able to carry forward their leave for a limited period – but it is not clear how effective this will be under the law in this country. Our view is that for the time being it is probably best for employers to sit tight and wait and see how the law develops.

The Goverment have indicated that legislation may be introduced to deal with this situation at some point during 2012 as part of their reform of employment law. We understand that the plan is to amend the Working Time Regulations to state that carry forward should be allowed – at the moment no details of a specific period have been given. We will of course keep you informed of any developments as they happen. 

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected])

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice.  The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario. 
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2011-11-29 00:57:262014-12-03 15:57:50Holiday and sickness – yet more news!

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
  • Employer unfairly counted disability-related absences when dismissing 29th June 2022
  • Did an Employment Tribunal correctly award an uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code in a sham redundancy case? 29th June 2022
  • Without prejudice negotiations – what is unambiguous impropriety? 29th June 2022
  • Does referring to a man’s baldness at work amount to sexual harassment? 25th May 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only