• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Harassment: the media maelstrom

1st February 2011

The law on sex discrimination and sexual harassment is nothing new – but nevertheless, many were shocked to see such a high-profile example in the news last week. Some have claimed that Andy Gray and Richard Keys engaged in nothing but banter, but it is clear that they were caught offside.

The definition of harassment in the Equality Act 2010 is unwanted conduct on discriminatory grounds which has the purpose or effect of violating dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.

The two football presenters probably didn’t think for a moment that they were making their remarks ‘in the course of their employment’, but although the comments were not intended for broadcast, they were still made in the studio between colleagues during their working hours. The law means that therefore, Sky could be held vicariously liable for their actions.

If their colleagues (male or female) had been offended and had decided to take the matter further, they could have brought discrimination claims against Gray and Keys themselves as well as Sky, with the potential for unlimited compensation. This personal liability is still something that many people are not aware of.

Sky would have a potential defence if they could show that it had taken “all reasonable steps” to prevent Gray and Keys from committing the discriminatory act. Examples of what can constitute reasonable steps would include having and implementing an effective equal opportunities policy, ensuring that any issues are addressed effectively to prevent them re-occurring, and possibly giving staff equal opportunities training. As urban legend has it that Sky is the kind of organisation that insists its female newsreaders leave a certain number of blouse buttons undone, it seems unlikely they would have been able to benefit from such a defence.

Clearly, from the material that has surfaced so far, there was a disciplinary case to answer against both Gray and Keys. Some people have been surprised that Sky acted so quickly in dismissing Andy Gray – while the details have not been released, there certainly was not time for them to have gone through all the steps set out in the ACAS Code, for example. Andy Gray has apparently instructed solicitors and no doubt they will be making this point.

However, in reality, when employees are paid such massive salaries (Andy Gray’s salary is reported to have been £1.7m) employment law can pale into insignificance. The potential damage to Sky’s brand and advertising revenue will have been worth far more than any employment law claim Gray could bring, especially taking into account the statutory cap on the compensatory award for unfair dismissal, which is now £68,400 (see our update here). And even if an offended employee had brought a claim, the costs to Sky would probably have been a drop in the ocean.

Despite this, there are still important points that ordinary employers can take from this whole debacle. The first is that preventing discrimination isn’t just ‘political correctness gone mad’ – it makes for a better working environment, and it also makes sound business sense. These days, bad news travels even faster than it used to, thanks to social media, and employers who turn a blind eye to discrimination could quickly find their reputation ruined, as well as having to pay potentially unlimited compensation.

If you suspect you may have an equivalent situation brewing in your organisation then it is crucial that it is addressed. We can help – why not give us a call to talk things through?

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected])

© Pure Employment Law Limited, 2011. Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice.  The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2011-02-01 11:00:202014-12-03 16:01:59Harassment: the media maelstrom

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Discrimination found in gender critical belief case 27th July 2022
  • Court of Appeal overturns Tesco fire and rehire injunction 27th July 2022
  • Changes to fit notes 27th July 2022
  • Where are we with the fire and rehire Code of Practice? 27th July 2022
  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only