• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Furlough as alternative to redundancy?

26 August 2021

Question marks

As the scheme for claiming furlough for employees developed over time, employers have questioned whether its existence should affect their decision-making about the timing of redundancies. The concern was whether making an employee with over two years’ service redundant, whilst furlough was still in operation, could amount to unfair dismissal.

Government guidance on using furlough

In our April 2020 article, we noted that Government guidance was clear that employees could be made redundant whilst on furlough, and that employees’ redundancy rights (and other employment rights) would not be affected by them being furloughed. A fair redundancy process includes conducting a meaningful consultation where proper consideration is given to ways of avoiding redundancies. This involves listening to and considering the employee’s suggestions. We surmised in the article above, that if an employer terminated employment before the end of the furlough scheme, that the employer may need to justify why this action was taken. We considered the risk higher where employees could have been kept on furlough for longer, at minimal additional cost to the employer.

Two recent cases

Two Employment Tribunal judgments have been reached which addressed this issue. The decisions are not binding but show the type of judicial considerations taken.

In Mhindurwa v Lovingangels Care Ltd, the dismissal of a care assistant in July 2020 was deemed unfair. The Judge accepted that live-in carer work had diminished, and at the date of dismissal there was no work for the employee. However, the employer’s failure to adequately consider the employee’s request for furlough, and to provide a proper appeal (furlough was again not considered), rendered the dismissal unfair.

The Judge concluded that in July 2020, a reasonable employer would have considered whether the employee should be furloughed to avoid redundancy. The employer was criticised for not considering whether a period of furlough should be granted to see whether demand for live-in carers was restored.

In Handley v Tatenhill Aviation Ltd, Mr Handley was employed as a small aircraft flying instructor for 16 years until 10 August 2020, when he was dismissed for redundancy. The employer was a small business with 12 employees. Before the pandemic the business was struggling financially, and the Judge accepted that with the loss of income from the flight school and aircraft hire during lockdown, the company suffered a cash flow crisis. In April 2020, Mr Handley’s furlough agreement stated that furlough would be for 3 weeks initially or until he could return to work as normal. His claim for unfair dismissal was successful due to unfair procedure, but he did not succeed in arguing that the agreement wording prevented the redundancy, or that the employer should have kept him on furlough rather than dismiss him. The employer projected that in the foreseeable future they could not see that demand would increase, and that even when it did, they anticipated much reduced demand. The Judge accepted that the employer needed to cut costs regardless of the availability of the furlough scheme, and that although another employer might have kept Mr Handley on furlough for longer, it was not unfair to dismiss him in August 2020.

Should redundancies be made before the end of the furlough scheme?

It will not inevitably be unfair to make an employee redundant while the furlough scheme is in operation. However, employees may be able to challenge the fairness of a redundancy dismissal if putting them on furlough was not considered as an alternative, or a good explanation cannot be given as to why furlough was denied. The date of the decision to dismiss, is likely to be an important factor the Judge considers when determining whether the decision to dismiss was reasonable.

With the furlough scheme coming to an end on 30 September 2021, employers should by now have a better idea as to the likely demand for employees after this date, but should still discuss and document their reasons for ending furlough if redundancies are made before the scheme ends. Our team has many years of experience in advising employers on redundancy processes and can assist you if you are unsure of what to do.

If you are an employer considering whether you might need to make redundancies then we can help. Please call us on 01243 836840 for a no obligation chat, or email us at [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
  • Employer unfairly counted disability-related absences when dismissing 29th June 2022
  • Did an Employment Tribunal correctly award an uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code in a sham redundancy case? 29th June 2022
  • Without prejudice negotiations – what is unambiguous impropriety? 29th June 2022
  • Does referring to a man’s baldness at work amount to sexual harassment? 25th May 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only