• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Facebook and employer reputation – what is reasonable?

31st October 2011

As social media such as Twitter and Facebook are becoming increasingly important in many people’s lives, it is not surprising that we are seeing an increase in employment cases involving employees’ actions on social media. Two recent Employment Tribunal decisions illustrate the importance of having a social media policy in place – but they also remind us that social media hasn’t changed the basic principles that employers must always bear in mind.

Firstly, we have Preece v JD Wetherspoons plc. Miss Preece was a shift manager at a Wetherspoons pub and one evening a group of drinkers verbally abused her and physically threatened her. The group included two of the pub’s regulars, Brian and Sandra. The group were made to leave the pub but shortly afterwards Miss Preece received three abusive calls on her mobile phone.

Miss Preece was very upset by what had happened. Her version of events was that she tried to contact her manager but as he was on holiday, she vented her anger by posting on her Facebook page from her mobile phone. Various people responded to her post and a chain of comments was created. Miss Preece made several comments in the chain which mentioned Brian and Sandra by name.

Unfortunately, although she was under the impression that only about 40-50 people could see the comments, her Facebook privacy settings meant that about 600 people could see them, including the daughter of Brian and Sandra. Wetherspoons received a complaint, and after going through the disciplinary process, dismissed Miss Preece for gross misconduct.

The Tribunal found that the dismissal was fair. One of the key factors was that Wetherspoons had a clear social media policy explaining that disciplinary action could be taken if comments on social media affected the company’s reputation, and also that Miss Preece had been at work when she had made the comments.

The other more recent case is that of Whitham v Club 24 trading as Ventura. Here, Ms Whitham was a team leader working for a company which worked closely with Skoda/Volkswagen. She had a frustrating day at work and made some comments on Facebook (outside working hours) including: “I think I work in a nursery and I do not mean working with plants.” These comments could only be seen by her friends, which numbered about 50 people.

 Two of her colleagues who had viewed the exchange on Facebook reported it to Club 24, and Ms Whitham was suspended. She was extremely apologetic. The company followed its disciplinary procedure and she was dismissed for gross misconduct on the basis that her comments could have damaged the relationship with Skoda/Volkswagen and were a breach of confidence.

 The Employment Tribunal found that the dismissal was unfair because the company had overreacted. Ms Whitham was a relatively junior employee and therefore it was unlikely that her comments could have jeopardised the relationship with Skoda/Volkswagen. It appears that the Tribunal considered that this was more of a general moan about work, rather than something specifically directed to a particular customer or client.

Although the company had policies which referred to social media, these were aimed at breaches of confidentiality and although the company had argued that Ms Whitham’s comments fell into this category, the Tribunal disagreed.

These decisions were both at Employment Tribunal level and are therefore not binding on other Tribunals. However, the cases both show that with or without social media, employers’ decisions still need to be reasonable. Often employers assume that employees’ comments could damage reputation when it may be very unlikely to be the case. The situation should always be properly investigated and considered. Employers will always be in a stronger position to take action if they have a clear social media policy in place.

  • Does your organisation have an up to date social media policy? If not, then give us a call!

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected])

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice.  The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario. 
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2011-10-31 00:40:482014-12-03 15:58:31Facebook and employer reputation – what is reasonable?

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
  • Employer unfairly counted disability-related absences when dismissing 29th June 2022
  • Did an Employment Tribunal correctly award an uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code in a sham redundancy case? 29th June 2022
  • Without prejudice negotiations – what is unambiguous impropriety? 29th June 2022
  • Does referring to a man’s baldness at work amount to sexual harassment? 25th May 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only