• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Extending time limits for Employment Tribunal claims

28th November 2013/in News /by Nicola Brown

All claims in the Employment Tribunals have clear time limits attached to them. For example, a claim for unfair dismissal must be brought within 3 months of the date employment terminated. A discrimination claim must be brought within 3 months of the discriminatory act. However, there are circumstances in which an Employment Tribunal has discretion to extend the time limit so as to accept a claim after the original deadline has passed.

Recently the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered two appeals relating to time limits. The first concerned a decision to grant an extension in a claim for unfair dismissal and unlawful deductions (Norbert Dentressangle Logistics Limited v Mr Hutton (2013)). The second concerned a decision that a claim for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination was out of time (Robinson v Fairhill Medical Practice (2013)).

Employment Tribunals may only extend time in unfair dismissal cases where it is satisfied of the following:

  • That it was “not reasonably practicable” for the complaint to be presented before the end of the deadline.
  • While the claim was not presented before the end of the deadline, the claim was nevertheless presented within a reasonable period.

The test is different for discrimination claims, where the Employment Tribunal must consider whether it is “just and equitable” to extend the time limit. This test is in practice easier for a claimant to overcome.

In the case of Norbert Dentressangle Logistics Limited v Mr Hutton, Mr Hutton was dismissed from his employment on 18 January 2012. His dismissal followed disciplinary action against him involving allegations of conspiracy to defraud and theft. The time limit for lodging his claim expired on 17 April 2012.  Mr Hutton did not lodge his claim until 30 May 2012. Therefore, it was exactly six weeks out of time.

In the Employment Tribunal hearing on the matter, the Employment Judge accepted Mr Hutton’s evidence that after 7 March 2012 he could not face doing anything as he was “not functioning at all at these times.” Mr Hutton suffered anxiety and was unable to leave his home for a time. As such, Mr Hutton said he only felt well enough to deal with lodging a claim in May. The Employment Judge felt the evidence of Mr Hutton was credible, and that it was not reasonably practicable for the Mr Hutton to have presented the claim until May when he felt able to do so. He was allowed to proceed with his claim.

The employer appealed against this decision to the EAT. There were various issues raised in the appeal, but it was highlighted that there was no medical evidence provided to support Mr Hutton’s version of events, and also that he had engaged in some correspondence with the company during April.

The EAT decided that the decision of the Employment Judge should stand as her overall assessment was fine in regard to the statutory test, although they were critical that it lacked detail. The Employment Judge had found Mr Hutton’s evidence credible and therefore, the EAT said it was reasonable for Mr Hutton to have lodged his claim after the deadline.

In the case of Robinson v Fairhill Medical Practice, Mrs Robinson was summarily dismissed for gross misconduct. Mrs Robinson was absent from work due to illness, and all correspondence was being sent via her solicitor. The company sent confirmation of Mrs Robinson’s dismissal to her solicitor via email on 6 July 2011. The solicitor informed Mrs Robinson on 7 July 2011, and this was not seen by her until 8 July 2011.

The Employment Tribunal firstly had to consider what the effective date of termination was. Case law has established that the three‑month period to lodge a claim runs from the date on which the employee has read a dismissal letter or has had a reasonable opportunity to read it. As the solicitor was acting as Mrs Robinson’s agent, the effective date of termination was 7 July 2011 when the solicitor communicated the dismissal to her. The deadline for a claim was therefore 6 October 2011. However, the claims for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination were not lodged until 8 October 2011; 2 days after the expiry of the time limit.

The Employment Tribunal struck out both claims as out of time and Mrs Robinson appealed this decision to the EAT. The EAT decided that the Employment Tribunal had correctly struck out the claim for unfair dismissal, because there was no reasonable explanation for why the solicitor had not lodged the claim in time. However, the EAT overturned the decision to strike out the disability discrimination claim on the basis that the solicitor’s fault in the matter should not to be held against Mrs Robinson.

These cases highlight that employers cannot always be confident that a claim lodged out of time will not proceed, particularly with discrimination claims. It is logical that claims lodged many months or even years after the deadline has passed are unlikely to be allowed to proceed. However, those lodged only a few weeks or months after the deadline carry some risk if a claimant persuades an Employment Tribunal to allow it to proceed. That said, such matters are examined on a case-by-case basis so if any matters arise around an issue with a deadline, we recommend that specific advice is sought at the time.

Do you need advice on time limit matters for Employment Tribunal claims? We can help. Please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2013-11-28 11:10:052014-12-03 16:04:24Extending time limits for Employment Tribunal claims

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • FAQs about COT3s 18th December 2020
  • Can an employer withdraw a notice of redundancy? 18th December 2020
  • Will employers be able to insist that staff have the Covid-19 vaccination? 18th December 2020
  • Furlough over Christmas? 18th December 2020
  • Update – Furlough scheme extended 18th December 2020
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only