• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Employment Tribunal claim struck out due to Claimant’s conduct

22 July 2021

Scales of Justice image

Employers who have Employment Tribunal claims brought against them often find the proceedings stressful to deal with, but that can be even more the case when the Claimant is representing themselves (a litigant in person). Whilst the majority of litigants in person behave appropriately, a small number make unnecessary and inappropriate attacks on the employer and on any individuals who they see as responsible for the matters leading to their claim. The Employment Appeal Tribunal in Scotland recently considered whether it was correct for the Employment Tribunal to strike out a case because of the correspondence sent by the Claimant.

Background

In A v B, the Claimant (A) who was a doctor for an NHS Trust, brought claims arising from her dismissal on the grounds of misconduct, including unfair dismissal, and sex and religious discrimination. A had been having an intimate relationship with a colleague during the course of her employment, which had broken down.

In the course of the proceedings, A sent a number of emails to that colleague and to another colleague, who were both potential witnesses, and to the solicitor acting for B. The emails contained accusations of bullying and harassment, as well as intimidation, threatening behaviour, and other unlawful conduct.

Strike out

B applied to strike out A’s claims under the Tribunal’s rules of procedure. At any stage of the proceedings, either on its own initiative or on the application of a party, a Tribunal may strike out all or part of a claim or response on any of the following grounds:

  • that the manner in which the proceedings have been conducted by or on behalf of the Claimant or the Respondent has been scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious;
  • for non-compliance with an order of the Tribunal;
  • that the Tribunal considers that it is no longer possible to have a fair hearing in respect of the claim or response.

The Tribunal refused B’s application, as although it found A’s emails to be scandalous, unreasonable and vexatious, it had to consider whether a fair trial was still possible and whether strike out in the whole circumstances was a justified and proportionate response to her behaviour. The Tribunal felt that A should be given the chance to respond to “robust case management” and made orders making it clear to A that there should be no repeat of the previous correspondence sent.

Despite this, A then sent further correspondence of a similar nature . B made a second application for her case to be struck out, and this time the Tribunal agreed that strike out was the correct course of action.

The appeal

A appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, who found that two of her emails were sent before she received the Tribunal’s order, and so these should not have been taken into account. However, the decision to strike out the case was upheld based on the other emails, as A had breached the orders aimed at controlling her correspondence, the emails were intimidatory, and there was no indication that she would act with restraint in future.

How useful is this judgment?

Employers will be reassured by the decision made here and it is useful in providing a clear warning to Claimants to act reasonably. However, this was a fairly extreme example of the type of behaviour that can be demonstrated by some litigants in person. In many cases, the conduct will not be sufficient to lead to a successful strike out application. Employers will continue to be upset, frustrated and even angered by claims made against them but it is best to try and avoid becoming too emotionally involved, as that is unlikely to assist the employer’s case. Instructing a solicitor can take the pressure off an employer and our team are highly experienced in acting in Employment Tribunal cases, including many involving litigants in person.

If you are an employer and a claim has been brought against you at the Employment Tribunal, then we can help. Please call us on 01243 836840 for a no obligation chat, or email us at [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
  • Employer unfairly counted disability-related absences when dismissing 29th June 2022
  • Did an Employment Tribunal correctly award an uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code in a sham redundancy case? 29th June 2022
  • Without prejudice negotiations – what is unambiguous impropriety? 29th June 2022
  • Does referring to a man’s baldness at work amount to sexual harassment? 25th May 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only