• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Discrimination – motive of decision maker

29th May 2015

The Court of Appeal has recently held in CLFIS (UK) Ltd v Reynolds (2015) that if there was no discriminatory motive on the part of a sole decision maker in the decision to dismiss then there was no discrimination, even if the decision maker relied upon reports of others who were motivated by discrimination.

This case concerned Dr Reynolds, who was an employee of Canada Life for over 20 years. After her employment ended, Dr Reynolds continued to work for Canada Life as Chief Medical Officer under a consultancy agreement, until the agreement was terminated by Canada Life. At the time that her consultancy agreement was terminated, Dr Reynolds was 73 years old.

The decision to terminate the consultancy agreement was made by the General Manager of Canada Life in the UK. Prior to the termination of Dr Reynolds’ consultancy agreement, others within Canada Life had been dissatisfied with her ways of working for some time. The General Manager had attended a series of presentations including one given by the Managing Director of the Division with input from the Director of Claimants Management Services which drew attention to issues with Dr Reynolds’ performance.

Dr Reynolds issued proceedings in the Tribunal claiming direct age discrimination. The Tribunal found that the decision to terminate the consultancy agreement was taken by the General Manager alone and therefore it considered only his motivation in reaching the decision, not the motivation of the others involved in the presentation.

The Tribunal found that Dr Reynolds had established facts from which the Tribunal could conclude, in the absence of an adequate explanation from Canada Life, that she had been discriminated against. However, the Tribunal also found that Canada Life had a non-discriminatory explanation; Dr Reynold’s performance and the fact that it did not believe she was capable of change. The Tribunal found that in this case the assumption that Dr Reynolds would not be capable of change was not based on her age. The Tribunal dismissed her claim, but Dr Reynolds appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).

At the EAT, Canada Life argued that where the decision of the sole decision maker was influenced by reports prepared by others, the Tribunal should consider the mental processes of those others if they acted for reasons which were discriminatory. The EAT concluded that the views of those who gave the presentation had been a significant influence on the General Manager’s decision, and the Tribunal should have considered their mental processes in addition to those of the General Manager. The EAT ordered that the claim be remitted to the Tribunal to be re-determined, however Canada Life then appealed that decision to the Court of Appeal.

At the Court of Appeal, Canada Life argued that even if the mental processes of the others should be considered by the Tribunal, in this case Dr Reynolds had not brought her claim on that basis.

The Court of Appeal allowed the company’s appeal. The key point about this case is that the decision to terminate Dr Reynolds’ consultancy agreement was not a joint decision but it was made solely by the General Manager. If, however, the Tribunal had found that the decision was made jointly then it would have to consider the motivation of all involved because if any of them were motivated by discrimination then the decision would be tainted.

The Court of Appeal held that supplying information or opinions does not constitute participation in the decision, it is a separate act which should have been pleaded separately by Dr Reynolds. The Court held that this was the correct approach even if by the time a Claimant learns of the influence of others in the decision, for example through the exchange of witness statements, they are out of time to bring a claim because where the Claimant has a good reason the Tribunal has power to extend time limits to enable it to do justice.

This case concerned a rather complex point but is nevertheless useful for employers, who can potentially rely on this case where decisions made by individuals are being challenged. Inevitably the decision may take account of information or evidence from a number of sources, but if the decision maker themselves is not tainted by discrimination, it will almost certainly be difficult for a claimant to show that the decision was discriminatory.

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2015-05-29 09:00:142015-05-29 11:33:19Discrimination – motive of decision maker

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
  • Employer unfairly counted disability-related absences when dismissing 29th June 2022
  • Did an Employment Tribunal correctly award an uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code in a sham redundancy case? 29th June 2022
  • Without prejudice negotiations – what is unambiguous impropriety? 29th June 2022
  • Does referring to a man’s baldness at work amount to sexual harassment? 25th May 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only