• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Departing from an agreed reference was disability discrimination

18th December 2015/in News /by Nicola Brown

We deal with a lot of Settlement Agreements between employers and departing employees, and often an agreed reference forms part of the deal. Following on from our recent workshops on Settlement Agreements, and Nicola’s article last month on myths about Settlement Agreements, we now look at a recent case highlighting some of the issues that can occur when an employer strays from the agreed reference in a Settlement Agreement.

The recent case of Pnaiser v NHS England and Coventry City Council concerned whether a negative reference, and the subsequent withdrawal of a job offer because of that reference, amounted to discrimination arising from disability.

Ms Pnaiser was employed by Coventry City Council and had significant absences from work due to a medical condition which amounted to a disability under the Equality Act 2010. She was made redundant by the Council and signed a Settlement Agreement which included an agreed reference. Ms Pnaiser was later offered a job with the NHS, subject to satisfactory references. One reference, which was obtained from a Dr Fleming, mentioned that she had undergone surgical procedures, causing two occasions of absence. When the NHS requested a reference from the Council, they received a reference in the form that had been agreed in the Settlement Agreement. The reference was sent by Ms Pnaiser’s former line manager, Ms Tennant, with an offer to discuss the matter further. Professor Rashid, who had interviewed Ms Pnaiser, subsequently telephoned Ms Tennant.

Professor Rashid said Ms Tennant told him that Ms Pnaiser had had significant time off work, that she would not employ Ms Pnaiser in the role and that she did not think Ms Pnaiser would be able to undertake the role.

The NHS withdrew the job offer, and Ms Pnaiser brought claims of discrimination arising from disability against the NHS and the Council (the Respondents).

Discrimination arising from disability occurs when: A treats B unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of B’s disability. A will not be liable if it can show the treatment is a ‘proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim’ (neither Respondent raised this argument in this case). There will be no discrimination arising from disability if A can show that it did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that B had the disability.

The Council conceded that they were aware of Ms Pnaiser’s disability. The Employment Tribunal found that Professor Rashid, and therefore the NHS, ought to have known of Ms Pnaiser’s disability because of the comments in Dr Fleming’s reference, Ms Tennant’s mention of significant absence and Professor Rashid’s own knowledge and understanding. Ms Pnaiser’s claims, however, were dismissed. The Tribunal found that she had failed to shift the burden of proof onto either Respondent to prove that their treatment of her was not discriminatory.

Ms Pnaiser appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal. The EAT allowed Ms Pnaiser’s appeal and found she had been subject to unlawful discrimination. The EAT found that the Tribunal had set an “impermissibly high hurdle” by requiring Ms Pnaiser to show that the only inference that could be drawn was a discriminatory one before it could conclude that the burden of proof shifted to the Respondents. The EAT said that the question should have been whether the absence was consciously or unconsciously a reason in Ms Tennant’s mind for giving the negative reference. The EAT felt that in this case, it had been.

This case highlights some of the risks faced by employers in straying from the reference that has been agreed as part of a Settlement Agreement and in giving verbal references. Prospective employers can find themselves in a difficult position when they receive a negative reference about a potential new employee which causes them to consider withdrawing the job offer, but which may also lead to claims of discrimination.

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2015-12-18 01:10:012015-12-18 10:15:54Departing from an agreed reference was disability discrimination

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • FAQs about COT3s 18th December 2020
  • Can an employer withdraw a notice of redundancy? 18th December 2020
  • Will employers be able to insist that staff have the Covid-19 vaccination? 18th December 2020
  • Furlough over Christmas? 18th December 2020
  • Update – Furlough scheme extended 18th December 2020
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only