• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Compulsory Retirement and Age Discrimination– Seldon again!

26th June 2013/in News /by Nicola Brown

You may recall our article in May 2012 about the case of Mr Seldon, a partner in a Kent law firm. In that article we reported on the Supreme Court’s decision to reject Mr Seldon’s argument that by being forced to retire as a partner in his firm when he reached the age of 65, he was being discriminated against on the grounds of age. The Supreme Court held that it may be possible to show that compulsory retirement was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim, and thus not amount to age discrimination. They referred the case back to the Employment Tribunal to determine whether, on the facts, this was the case.

As set out in our previous article, the following 3 aims had been put forward as legitimate:

  1. Ensuring that associates were given the opportunity for partnership after a reasonable period as an associate, thereby ensuring that associates do not leave the firm;
  2. Facilitating long term planning by creating a reasonable expectation of when vacancies will arise; and
  3. Limiting the need to expel partners by way of performance management, thus contributing to a ‘congenial and supportive’ culture in the firm.

The Supreme Court said that in order to justify direct discrimination, the ‘legitimate aim’ relied upon must be a social policy objective and have a public interest, not just something relevant to a private business, such as preserving profits. For example, a legitimate aim may be the need for “intergenerational fairness”, i.e. the importance of giving the younger generation an opportunity to progress through the ranks. Using this test, the Supreme Court confirmed that all 3 were capable of amounting to legitimate aims and therefore could be used to justify compulsory retirement.

However, the key question was whether the retirement of partners (and Mr Seldon in particular) at age 65 was a proportionate means of achieving those aims. This was the question which was remitted to the Employment Tribunal for consideration. One of the things the Tribunal has been ordered to take into account was that at the time when Mr Seldon was retired, the default retirement age still applied so that employees (as opposed to partners) could be forced to retire at 65.

The Employment Tribunal have now considered Mr Seldon’s case in light of the directions from the Supreme Court, and held that his compulsory retirement was justifiable and therefore his claim of age discrimination failed. It held that retention and business planning were legitimate aims, that collegiality could also be a legitimate aim.

It is important for employers to realise that this case does not give a green light for employers to impose mandatory retirement ages.  First, each case will depend on its own fact. Second, and probably more importantly, this case was decided based on social policy and demographics in 2006 which was before the abolition of the national retirement age for employees. That situation has obviously moved on in the last 7 years, and the Employment Tribunal expressly stated that that the case might be decided differently if the same facts arose today.  In our view, in the vast majority of businesses, it would be a brave employer who tried to impose a mandatory retirement age.

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.

Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2013-06-26 14:03:232014-12-03 15:49:08Compulsory Retirement and Age Discrimination– Seldon again!

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Fire and rehire – what does it mean and is it lawful? 30th March 2021
  • Sleeping on the job – Sleep-in workers not entitled to National Minimum Wage 30th March 2021
  • Do your contracts need updating post lockdown? 30th March 2021
  • What are Vento bands and what are the latest rates? 30th March 2021
  • Tribunal rates and compensation limits from 6 April 2021 17th March 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only