• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • David Jones
    • Debbie Poole
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Compulsory retirement – An unusual case study

21 October 2021

Since April 2011, the default retirement age of 65 no longer applies. Therefore, an employer setting a compulsory retirement age will be at risk of unlawfully discriminating against its employees unless it can show that compulsory retirement is objectively justified as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. The Employment Appeal Tribunal has recently heard appeals from two separate and opposing Employment Tribunal decisions in relation to a compulsory retirement policy operated by the same employer. This led to an interesting and perhaps unexpected outcome.

The cases

The appeal cases of Pitcher v the University of Oxford and the University of Oxford v Ewart, arose out of the Employer Justified Retirement Age (EJRA) scheme operated by Oxford University, which in general terms led to employees facing compulsory retirement at 67.

The University had the following legitimate aims in operating the EJRA:

  1. inter-generational fairness;
  2. succession planning; and
  3. equality and diversity

The EJRA was said to facilitate other measures in achieving those aims by ensuring vacancy creation was not delayed and recruitment into senior academic roles might take place from a younger, more diverse range of people.

The Employment Tribunal hearing for Professor Pitcher’s case, found the EJRA to be justified and that there was no age discrimination or unfair dismissal, whereas the completely separate Employment Tribunal hearing for Professor Ewart’s case found the opposite, and upheld his claims of age discrimination and unfair dismissal.

Findings of the Employment Appeal Tribunal

The Employment Appeal Tribunal found that the EJRA enabled the legitimate aims outlined above to be achieved. In terms of whether the legitimate aims could be objectively justified, it was said that the nature of the assessment undertaken by the different Employment Tribunals meant that it was possible for them to reach different conclusions.

It was found that there were two significant differences in the way in which the evidence was presented to the two Employment Tribunals:

  • The Tribunals received different evidence on the detriment suffered by those to whom the EJRA applied, and so were entitled to give different weight to the mitigating factors relied on. For instance, in Professor Pitcher’s case, the Tribunal had given weight to survey evidence regarding those who would have continued in employment if the EJRA had not applied (only 24% who typically would have worked a further three years). The Tribunal in Professor Pitcher’s case had also considered the mitigating effects of provisions that allowed for an extension of employment beyond the age of 67, and other post-retirement opportunities for senior academics.
  • One Tribunal had the benefit of statistical evidence on the impact of the EJRA upon the creation of vacancies, which was not available to the other. In Professor Ewart’s case, he had presented a statistical analysis which showed the rate of vacancies created by the EJRA was trivial (2 – 4%).

On this basis, the Employment Appeal Tribunal decided that neither Employment Tribunal had made an error when reaching their decisions and so both appeals were dismissed.

Conclusion

The unusual aspect of this decision is that it upheld different decisions made at Employment Tribunal level in respect of the same compulsory retirement policy. Employers might therefore be worried about whether their own policy on compulsory retirement can be justified. In our view, employers with such concerns should start by looking at what they say their legitimate aims are in operating the policy and should then collect and review any evidence to see whether those aims are being met. For example, if compulsory retirement is not leading to senior roles being offered to a younger and more diverse set of people, then maintaining the policy is going to be harder to justify.

This is a complex area of law, and we would always recommend taking legal advice before making decisions on whether to operate a compulsory retirement policy. Age discrimination claims can be very costly and can cause reputational damage too. Our team has significant experience in handling discrimination claims for employers and can work with you to reduce the risk of claims being brought against you.

If you are an employer considering a compulsory retirement age issue, then we can help. Please call us on 01243 836840 for a no obligation chat, or email us at [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Discrimination found in gender critical belief case 27th July 2022
  • Court of Appeal overturns Tesco fire and rehire injunction 27th July 2022
  • Changes to fit notes 27th July 2022
  • Where are we with the fire and rehire Code of Practice? 27th July 2022
  • Can long Covid be a disability? 29th June 2022
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2022

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only