• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Can reducing hours create a redundancy situation?

27th September 2012/in News /by Nicola Brown

When work levels start to drop, employers can sometimes find that although they still need someone to fill a particular role, they no longer need that person to work the same number of hours. When this happens, employers have often tended to deal with the reduction as a variation of contract and seek the employee’s agreement, meaning that if the employee refused to agree to reduce their hours, they would be dismissed for ‘some other substantial reason’. However, the case of Packman t/a Packman Lucas Association v Fauchon showed that this scenario may in fact create a redundancy situation.

Ms Fauchon was employed by Packman as a bookkeeper. In 2010 Packman’s business had declined and a new software package had been introduced, meaning that there was a reduction in the need for bookkeeping work. The company therefore asked Ms Fauchon to agree to a reduction in her working hours. She refused to agree, and was dismissed. She argued that she was in fact redundant and was entitled to a redundancy payment.

The Employment Tribunal were referred to the 2003 case of Aylward and others v Glamorgan Holiday Home Ltd, which found that there cannot be a redundancy situation where there is no proposal to reduce headcount. Unusually, and somewhat controversially, despite the fact that the Aylward case is Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) level and therefore binding upon an Employment Tribunal, they declined to follow it and found that in Ms Fauchon’s case, the lack of a reduction in headcount did not prevent her being entitled to redundancy pay.

Packman appealed to the EAT against the Tribunal’s decision. The EAT looked carefully at the definition of redundancy, which states that redundancy is where “the requirements of [the employer’s] business for employees to carry out work of a particular kind… have ceased or diminished or are expected to case or diminish.” In Ms Fauchon’s case, Packman’s need for bookkeeping work had clearly diminished, hence why they were asking her to reduce her hours.

The EAT then examined the Aylward case and concluded that it was wrongly decided. It gave the example of a situation where two full-time employees are asked to reduce their working hours by 50%, and the workforce is treated as having been cut by one, even though the number of employees remains the same.

The EAT therefore upheld the Tribunal’s decision that Ms Fauchon was entitled to a redundancy payment.

This decision has potentially wide-ranging implications in the workplace and also raises a number of questions. In this case the proposed reduction in Ms Fauchon’s hours was ‘significant’ – but would the same principle apply if the employee is being asked to reduce their working time by only a small amount?

The Fauchon judgment will mean that situations which have previously not been thought of as redundancy will now have to be carefully considered, which will be a particular issue in the current economic climate where many employers have been asking their employees to agree to reduced hours in order to save costs. This will be the case particularly where 20 or more employees are involved and therefore collective consultation rules will apply.

The Fauchon case makes it considerably easier for workplace reorganisations to be considered as redundancy situations, and therefore gives increased protection to employees. Redundancy situations have their own requirements for reasonableness, procedure and consultation, which are not necessarily addressed when employers treat the changes as a variation of contract, and therefore the decision may give rise to more unfair dismissal claims.

From a legal point of view, Tribunals will be left in an uncertain position as we now have two conflicting EAT authorities, so Tribunals will have to make difficult decisions about which to follow. Hopefully the Fauchon case will go to the Court of Appeal to give a more definitive answer – we will of course keep you updated on any developments.

If you need to consider reducing your employees’ hours, it is crucial to take specific legal advice. We can help – please give us a call on 01243 836840 or email us on [email protected].  

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2012-09-27 22:09:492015-06-02 01:39:16Can reducing hours create a redundancy situation?

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • What to expect during 2021 – employment law developments 21st January 2021
  • Did “office banter” about an employee’s memory amount to age discrimination? 21st January 2021
  • Update on Furlough 20th January 2021
  • Restricting Restrictive Covenants? 20th January 2021
  • Q&A: What to expect from a remote Tribunal hearing 20th January 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only