• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Can offering a severance package be required as a reasonable adjustment?

29 July 2020

Question marks

In the recent case of Hill v Lloyds Bank plc the Employment Appeal Tribunal was asked to consider whether it would be required as a reasonable adjustment for Lloyds to give an undertaking to an employee that she would not be required to work with certain colleagues in the future, and that if there was no alternative it would offer her a severance package equivalent to redundancy.

The facts

Mrs Hill had been employed by Lloyds for over 30 years. She was on sick leave between July 2016 and October 2017 for stress, which she said was caused by bullying and harassment by two colleagues, M and B. She had raised a grievance in relation to M, but this was not upheld by the bank. When Mrs Hill came back to work, she did not want to work with M or B and this was agreed. However, she was worried that in the future she may have to work with them, and claimed that this prospect filled her with absolute dread and fear, to the extent that she felt physically sick. Mrs Hill sought an undertaking from her employer that she would not have to work with or report to either M or B, and that in the event that business demands left her employer with no practical alternative, it would offer her a severance package equivalent to what she would have received on redundancy.

Lloyds refused to give the undertaking and Mrs Hill brought an Employment Tribunal claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments under section 20 of the Equality Act 2010. It was accepted that Mrs Hill was a disabled person by reason of reactive depression. She argued that she was placed at a substantial disadvantage compared to a non-disabled person in that she was in a state of constant fear, worry and stress that she may be required to work with M or B, which exacerbated her physical and mental symptoms.

The duty to make reasonable adjustments

Section 20 of the Equality Act 2010 imposes a duty on employers to make reasonable adjustments where a disabled employee is placed at a substantial disadvantage by an employer’s “provision, criterion or practice”. It is for an Employment Tribunal to decide objectively what amounts to a reasonable adjustment in the circumstances. It will take into account matters such as whether the adjustment would alleviate the disabled person’s disadvantage, the cost of the adjustment in light of the employer’s financial resources, and any disruption that the adjustment might have on the employer’s activities.

The decision at Employment Tribunal level

The Employment Tribunal upheld the claim. It found that Lloyds had a practice of not giving undertakings, only words of comfort in such situations and that this practice placed Mrs Hill at a substantial disadvantage because it meant her working in fear. In the Tribunal’s view, the undertaking proposed would have been reasonable to give and therefore Lloyds had failed in its duty to make reasonable adjustments. Lloyds appealed the decision to the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

The decision on appeal

The Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed the appeal. It rejected Lloyds’ argument that its refusal to give the undertaking was a one-off decision rather than a practice capable of falling within section 20 of the Equality Act 2010. The Employment Tribunal had made a clear finding of fact that it made a practice of not giving such undertakings. It also rejected Lloyds’ arguments that it was unreasonable for them to be required to commit to making a severance payment at some point in the future when Mrs Hill may not in fact be redundant, and that the purpose of a reasonable adjustment is to keep an employee in work, not to make provision for them to leave. The Employment Appeal Tribunal felt that it was reasonable to give the undertaking in the circumstances, as its purpose relating to the severance payment was to give a ‘backstop’ that would keep Mrs Hill at work without fearing that she would be required to work with M or B.

Conclusion

This case illustrates how widely the duty to make reasonable adjustments can be interpreted. Based on this case, employers may be concerned as to the adjustments that they might have to make to provide assurances to disabled employees who do not wish to work with certain colleagues. Whilst it is important that employers give proper consideration to genuine concerns expressed by disabled employees in this type of situation, the Employment Appeal Tribunal in this case felt that an undertaking in the form given will be relatively rare. The size and resources of Lloyds will no doubt have been a relevant factor for the Tribunal and the EAT when considering reasonableness, and it may not be reasonable for a smaller employer to give such an undertaking. What amounts to a reasonable adjustment will inevitably vary from case to case, depending on the circumstances. Where possible, taking steps to deal with an employee’s concerns at an early stage might prevent things from escalating, and we can advise you on strategies in relation to this.

If you are an employer dealing with issues relating to disability and reasonable adjustments, then we can help. Please call us on 01243 836840 for a no obligation chat, or email us at [email protected].

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Fire and rehire – what does it mean and is it lawful? 30th March 2021
  • Sleeping on the job – Sleep-in workers not entitled to National Minimum Wage 30th March 2021
  • Do your contracts need updating post lockdown? 30th March 2021
  • What are Vento bands and what are the latest rates? 30th March 2021
  • Tribunal rates and compensation limits from 6 April 2021 17th March 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only