• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Can an employer rely on Occupational Health report as to whether an employee is disabled?

20th December 2013/in News /by Nicola Brown

Most employers would understandably feel that if they have taken specialist advice from Occupational Health, they would be entitled to rely on the advice they have been given. Unfortunately the case of Gallop v Newport City Council [2013] shows that this may not always be correct.

Employers of disabled employees are under a duty not to discriminate against them on the grounds of their disability, and also to make reasonable adjustments to accommodate the disability. The obligations kick in when the employer is aware of the employee’s disability, or at a time when the employer ought reasonably to have been aware of the disability. Under the Equality Act 2010, a person is disabled if they have a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial impact on their ability to carry out normal day to day activities, and the impairment is likely to be long term.

In the Gallop case, Mr Gallop worked for Newport City Council and advised them that he was suffering from stress and that his symptoms included sleeplessness, nausea, loss of appetite and headaches. The Council asked their external Occupational Health adviser to assess Mr Gallop and write a report. Occupational Health concluded that Mr Gallop was suffering from stress related symptoms but that there was no sign of clinical depression. Over the following years Mr Gallop was signed off work on a number of occasions with his GP diagnosing him with depression. Occupational Health still stated that Mr Gallop was not suffering from a depressive illness. Mr Gallop then raised a grievance that the Council were not taking proper care of his health and safety. The Council, which had arranged for some of Mr Gallop’s duties to be removed from him, rejected the grievance. Throughout this period Mr Gallop continued to be assessed by Occupational Health and on two separate occasions they told the Council that he was not disabled, but without any explanation as to why they had reached that conclusion.

Mr Gallop was eventually dismissed, and he brought claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.  Newport City Council admitted that Mr Gallop suffered from a mental impairment, but argued that, whilst Occupational Health had advised that Mr Gallop had suffered from work-related stress, he had not been diagnosed with a mental impairment which had a substantial long-term adverse effect on him. Therefore even if Mr Gallop met the definition of disability, it was not something the Council were aware of, nor should they reasonably have been aware.

The Employment Tribunal upheld Mr Gallop’s unfair dismissal claim. In relation to his disability discrimination claim, the Tribunal found that Mr Gallop was disabled, but that unless Newport City Council had good reason for forming a different view, it was entitled to rely on the advice from Occupational Health as to whether or not Mr Gallop was disabled. As the Occupational Health advice was that Mr Gallop was not disabled, then even if he was in fact disabled, Newport City Council did not have the requisite knowledge to trigger the duty to make reasonable adjustments.

Mr Gallop appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). The EAT upheld the Employment Tribunal’s decision. Mr Gallop appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal allowed Mr Gallop’s appeal and sent the case back to the Employment Tribunal to consider his discrimination claim. They said that the task for the Employment Tribunal was to decide whether Newport City Council had actual or constructive knowledge of the facts concerning Mr Gallop’s disability. They held that the original Employment Tribunal did not ask itself that question and had simply allowed the Council to deny knowledge of disability by unquestioningly relying on the opinion from Occupational Health. The Court of Appeal said that they would have expected Occupational Health to consider the three elements of the test for disability and to base their conclusions on the answers to these questions: whether Mr Gallop had a physical or mental impairment; if so, whether that impairment has a substantial and long-term adverse effect; and whether the impairment affected his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities.

This case illustrates that it is ultimately the employer’s responsibility to make the assessment as to whether or not an employee is disabled. In making that assessment it is both acceptable and sensible for the employer to take into account the views of Occupational Health or other medical advisers, but they should not accept that advice blindly. The question of whether an employee meets the definition of disability can be difficult, and if there is reasonable doubt it is often prudent to assume that the employee is disabled and to act accordingly. It is also worth ensuring that medical advice is questioned if it appears not to have adequate reasoning.

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2013-12-20 14:01:332014-12-03 15:17:47Can an employer rely on Occupational Health report as to whether an employee is disabled?

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • FAQs about COT3s 18th December 2020
  • Can an employer withdraw a notice of redundancy? 18th December 2020
  • Will employers be able to insist that staff have the Covid-19 vaccination? 18th December 2020
  • Furlough over Christmas? 18th December 2020
  • Update – Furlough scheme extended 18th December 2020
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only