• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Can a dismissal be fair if final written warning is “manifestly inappropriate”?

30th November 2016/in News /by Nicola Brown

Employers are often faced with making difficult decisions, particularly when taking disciplinary action against long serving employees who have a previously clean record. The recent case of Bandara v British Broadcasting Corporation (2016) provides a good example of some of the pitfalls to watch out for.

Mr Bandara was employed by the BBC as a Senior Producer, and had nearly 18 years’ service with an unblemished disciplinary record, until two incidents in 2013. The first incident, in March 2013, involved Mr Bandara shouting at a manager – he apologised and no further action was taken. Then, in July 2013, Mr Bandara made a decision not to prioritise the story of the birth of Prince George (he did go on to publish the story that day, but after some delay).

The BBC then sought to discipline Mr Bandara over both incidents. Mr Bandara was found guilty of gross misconduct and received a final written warning, to remain live for 12 months.

The BBC then carried out further investigations into Mr Bandara’s behaviour, leading to a disciplinary hearing in May 2014. Mr Bandara was subsequently dismissed for gross misconduct.

Mr Bandara brought claims of discrimination and unfair dismissal against the BBC. Whilst both claims were dismissed by the Employment Tribunal (ET), the ET held that the circumstances which led to Mr Bandara being given the final written warning amounted to misconduct, but not gross misconduct. The ET found that the final written warning which the BBC took into account when dismissing Mr Bandara, was “manifestly inappropriate”, and said that his previous good record should have been treated as a point his favour. The ET also concluded that the March 2013 incident “was not something which months later could fairly have been resurrected as a substantial part of a final written warning”.

Nevertheless, the ET held that the decision to dismiss Mr Bandara was one which a reasonable employer could reach in all the circumstances, and was therefore a fair dismissal. The ET’s reasoning was that if Mr Bandara had been given only a written warning the first time round, rather than a final written warning, it would still have been live and still “something properly to be taken into account” in the later decision to dismiss him. The ET found that if it was a written warning rather than a final written warning, it “would not have rendered the decision to dismiss improper or unreasonable or excessive and beyond the range [of sanctions which a reasonable employer could impose]”.

Mr Bandara appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), arguing that his dismissal was unfair. The BBC cross-appealed, arguing that the final written warning was not “manifestly inappropriate”.

The EAT held that the ET was right to find that the final written warning issued to Mr Bandara was “manifestly inappropriate”, but that the ET had erred in its approach by asking itself whether the dismissal would have been fair had the BBC issued Mr Bandara with a written warning rather than a final written warning. The EAT criticised the ET for not focussing on the actual reasoning of the BBC, and whether, applying the objective standard of the reasonable employer, the BBC acted reasonably in dismissing Mr Bandara. The case was remitted back to the ET to consider this point.

This case serves as a warning to employers, to make sure that decisions to impose disciplinary sanctions are justifiable. The EAT noted that there are circumstances, albeit exceptional ones, where the ET should reopen an employer’s earlier decisions, and it held that the ET was entitled in Mr Bandara’s case to conclude that the final written warning was manifestly inappropriate. It was also noted in this case that Mr Bandara’s actions which led to the final written warning did not amount to gross misconduct under the BBC’s own disciplinary procedure.

So, in answer to the question “can dismissal be fair if the final written warning is manifestly inappropriate?”, well yes, potentially, but it would depend on whether the final written warning was relied upon by the employer when making the decision to dismiss, and whether the employer attached significant weight to that warning.

 

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2016-11-30 13:19:572016-11-30 15:07:42Can a dismissal be fair if final written warning is “manifestly inappropriate”?

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • Fire and rehire – what does it mean and is it lawful? 30th March 2021
  • Sleeping on the job – Sleep-in workers not entitled to National Minimum Wage 30th March 2021
  • Do your contracts need updating post lockdown? 30th March 2021
  • What are Vento bands and what are the latest rates? 30th March 2021
  • Tribunal rates and compensation limits from 6 April 2021 17th March 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected]pureemploymentlaw.co.uk | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only