• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Agency workers – their impact on collective redundancy and TUPE consultation

30th April 2013/in News /by Nicola Brown

It has long been the case that where an employer is considering making more than 20 people redundant within a 90 day period, or where there is a transfer of employment governed by the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE), there is an obligation on the employer to consult with recognised trade unions or the elected representatives of the employees affected. The remedy for a failure to comply with these provisions is a protective award of upto 90 days’ pay per employee in the case of collective redundancy, and 13 weeks’ pay for TUPE transfers.

This duty was extended by the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 which have required that in all transfers or collective redundancies since October 2011 the employees are to be told of the number of agency workers working temporarily for and under the supervision and direction of the employer, the parts of the undertaking in which they are working, and the type work which they are carrying out.  In the first reported case on these new obligations, Unison v London Borough of Barnet and another (2012), an Employment Tribunal considered whether the London Borough of Barnet had provided sufficient information about agency workers in their consultations with trade unions concerning potential redundancies and TUPE transfers.

The facts of the case were these. On 26 October 2011, the London Borough of Barnet gave notice to Unison and other trade unions that they were proposing to make redundancies that placed 97 employees at risk. This was one of a series of redundancy and transfer exercises going on as part of their “One Barnet Programme”, which also included a transfer of a number of their housing staff to Barnet Homes, and an outsourcing contract to NSL Ltd. These were both TUPE transfers which occurred on 1 April and 1 May 2012, respectively.

Although the provisions relating to collective redundancy had been amended on 1 October 2011, neither the London Borough of Barnet nor Unison was aware of this.  However Unison did raise an issue with a “lack of transparency” concerning agency workers in early November 2011. The London Borough of Barnet did provide some information about which teams within their structure utilised agency workers, but the information was incomplete, and a complete list of all the agency workers working for them was not given.   Unison brought a claim to the Tribunal on the basis that the London Borough of Barnet had failed to provide all the information required.

The claim succeeded. The Tribunal made three awards: in relation to those people who had been made redundant, 60 days’ pay; In relation to the transfer to Barnet Homes, the award was 40 days’ pay; and in relation to the transfer to NSL Limited, the award was equivalent to 50 days’ pay. The Tribunal emphasised that the purpose of protective awards is to punish the employer for its failure to comply with its consultation obligations, not to compensate the employees for any loss suffered. The difference in the levels of the various compensatory awards appears to have been based primarily on how relatively important the agency worker information was in the various consultation processes. Because the information was, in the Tribunal’s opinion, less crucial in relation to a TUPE transfer than in a redundancy exercise, the award to the transferred employees was lower than the award to the redundant employees. The award in relation to the second transfer, to NSL Limited, appears to have been higher (50 days instead of 40 days) in part due to the fact that, by that point, the London Borough of Barnet had been made aware of their breach, and yet had still failed to remedy it.

As always with these types of cases, they are very fact specific, and the level of award is very much an assessment by the Tribunal of the scale of the employer’s default, based on the evidence it hears.  However, the scale of the awards is a salutary warning to employers who are involved in collective redundancy or TUPE consultation exercises to ensure that they do comply with the agency worker requirements.

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected]).

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice. The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.
Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2013-04-30 12:50:372014-12-03 15:38:09Agency workers – their impact on collective redundancy and TUPE consultation

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • What to expect during 2021 – employment law developments 21st January 2021
  • Did “office banter” about an employee’s memory amount to age discrimination? 21st January 2021
  • Update on Furlough 20th January 2021
  • Restricting Restrictive Covenants? 20th January 2021
  • Q&A: What to expect from a remote Tribunal hearing 20th January 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only