• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: 01243 836 840   [email protected]
Pure Employment Law
  • Who We Are
    • Nicola Brown
    • Peter Stevens
    • Elena Elsam
    • David Jones
    • Linda Nye
    • Brenda Cherry
  • For Employers
    • Advice on HR and People issues
    • Investigations, Hearings and Appeals
    • Restructuring and Redundancy
    • Defending Employment Tribunal Claims
    • Dismissal of Senior Executives
    • Contracts, Handbooks and Policies
    • Employment Law Training
  • For Employees
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Workplace Issues including Disciplinary and Grievance
    • Bringing an Employment Tribunal Claim
  • Employment Law Events
  • Legal Updates
  • Testimonials
  • Vacancies
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

A warning for employers – do what you say you will do!

18th December 2015/in News /by Nicola Brown

The Employment Tribunal recently had to consider an unusual set of circumstances in the case of John-Charles v NHS Business Services Authority. The facts are that in October 2012 Dr John-Charles was alleged to be in breach of his employer’s IT policies. The matter was investigated, but not with any great urgency, and Dr John-Charles was told at the end of February 2013 that the matter would be considered at a disciplinary hearing to be heard on 7 March 2013.

In the meantime, Dr John-Charles had received a written warning in relation to a totally separate incident where he had refused to obey his manager’s instructions. Dr John-Charles was advised by HR that the person holding the disciplinary hearing in March 2013 would not be told about the warning issued to him in January.

The disciplinary hearing relating to the October 2012 incident did start to be heard on 7 March 2013, but then on 13 March 2013 the manager holding the hearing notified Dr John-Charles that she was delaying matters as she thought there may be a health issue for him in continuing at that time. The manager then indicated to Dr John-Charles that she was inclined to issue a final written warning in relation to the October 2012 incident. She then became aware of the other warning issued in January 2013 and decided to dismiss him. This decision was communicated to him on 13 May 2013.

Dr John-Charles instigated proceedings in the Employment Tribunal claiming unfair dismissal. He argued that the Authority should not have taken into account a warning which related to an incident which occurred at a later date than the incident which was being considered. The Tribunal rejected this argument. They held that the Authority was properly able to consider the later warning and that in all the circumstances the Authority’s decision did not fall outside the range of reasonable responses test in determining whether a dismissal was fair or not, and as such they dismissed the claim for unfair dismissal.

Dr John-Charles appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). There were two grounds of appeal. The first was that the Tribunal should have found the dismissal unfair because they should not have allowed the Authority to bring the January 2013 warning into the consideration of the correct sanction to impose for the October 2012 incident. The EAT rejected this argument and upheld the Tribunal’s decision on that point. The second ground of appeal was that Dr John-Charles had been told that the manager holding the disciplinary hearing relating to the October 2012 incident would not be informed about the January 2013 warning. They were, and this information fundamentally changed the decision which the manager decided to impose. Before they became aware of the January 2013 warning they had indicated that they were minded to issue a final written warning in relation to the October 2012 incident; once they became aware of the other warning they changed that decision to one of dismissal. The EAT held that by misleading Dr John-Charles on this point the authority had failed to accord him natural justice in this regard. They therefore overturned the decision of the Employment Tribunal and substituted a finding of unfair dismissal.

The facts of this case are pretty unusual, but they do make the point that if you tell an employee something about disciplinary sanctions, then you need to make sure you act in accordance with what you have told them!

If you would like to talk through a situation you are dealing with, or if you need advice on any aspect of employment law, please contact any member of the Pure Employment Law team (01243 836840 or [email protected])

Please note that this update is not intended to be exhaustive or be a substitute for legal advice.  The application of the law in this area will often depend upon the specific facts and you are advised to seek specific advice on any given scenario.

 

Share this article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg 0 0 Nicola Brown https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pure-Employment-Law-logo.jpg Nicola Brown2015-12-18 01:23:392015-12-18 10:16:31A warning for employers – do what you say you will do!

Join our mailing list

* = required field
Mailing Lists


Recent Legal Updates

  • What to expect during 2021 – employment law developments 21st January 2021
  • Did “office banter” about an employee’s memory amount to age discrimination? 21st January 2021
  • Update on Furlough 20th January 2021
  • Restricting Restrictive Covenants? 20th January 2021
  • Q&A: What to expect from a remote Tribunal hearing 20th January 2021
Link to: Contact Us

Any questions? Why not get in touch!

Our advice is always given in plain English without any waffle, and we focus on providing practical solutions to our clients’ problems.

Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATION

Pure Employment Law | 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH
[email protected] | Tel: 01243 836840

Pure Employment Law is the trading name of Pure Employment Law Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 07134294 and whose registered office is 1 Little London, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1PH. Pure Employment Law Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 533794. A list of the company’s directors is available for inspection at the registered office

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Pure Employment Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions | How to make a complaint | Sitemap

© Pure Employment Law 2021

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies as defined in our cookie policy.

Accept Cookie Policy

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only